N/A
N=28
Efficacy of Warming Device During Surgery
Surgery
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00715728 ↗Enrolled (actual)
28
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: The Rate of Core Rewarming Over the Range From 35°C to 37°C. — .24; .49 degrees Celcius / hr — p=0.91
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Observational
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Intraoperative warming with Bair Hugger forced air system (Device); Intraoperative warming with Hotdog resistive heating system (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- The Cleveland Clinic
- Primary completion
- Dec 2009
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY The Rate of Core Rewarming Over the Range From 35°C to 37°C. |
.24; .49 | 0.91 |
| PRIMARY Intraoperative Time Weighted Average Core Temperature |
36.24; 36.12 | 0.018 sig |
Summary
This study will test the hypothesis that an electric heating device, the Hot Dog warming system is as effective as the Bair Hugger forced air heating system.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Plastic surgery lasting approximately 5 hours
- Subjects over the age of 18 years
- Patient signed Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Plastic surgery lasting less than 5 hours
- Individuals under the age of 18 years
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00715728). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.