Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=339 Randomized Treatment

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Thrombosis: Reverse Taper Versus Non-tapered Catheters

Venous Thrombosis

Enrolled (actual)
339
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Evidence of PICC-related Venous Thrombosis — 102; 95 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Tapered PICC (Device); Non-tapered PICC (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Primary completion
Jan 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Evidence of PICC-related Venous Thrombosis
102; 95
SECONDARY
Post-operative Bleeding
4; 9
SECONDARY
Symptomatic PICC-related Venous Thrombosis
6; 7

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different marketed PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) designs. Clotting rates, procedural bleeding and ease of catheter insertion will be compared. It is hypothesized that the non-tapered design has a lower clotting rate and is easier to place than the tapered design. Bleeding rates are expected to be about the same.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All inpatients, age 18 to 90, in need of de novo central venous access with a double lumen catheter indication of > 2 weeks
  • Informed consent and HIPAA consent forms discussed and signed by patient or their authorized representative

Exclusion Criteria

  • Skin related problems around the insertion site (infection, phlebitis, scars)
  • History of mastectomy/axillary dissection on insertion side
  • Coagulopathy with an INR of > 2.0
  • Thrombocytopenia with platelets 3.0 mg/dL
  • Documented current upper extremity or central venous thrombosis
  • Hypercoagulable states (protein C or S deficiency, AT-III deficiency, lupus anticoagulant)
  • Catheters needed for therapy within less than an hour (emergent placement not allowing sufficient time for proper research consent and randomization)
  • Patient has already been enrolled in this research study
  • Life expectancy less than 1 month
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00728819). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search