Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=133 Treatment

Study of the SilverHawk™ /TurboHawk™ Plaque Excision Systems Used With SpiderFX to Treat Calcified Peripheral Arterial Disease (DEFINITIVE Ca++)

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Enrolled (actual)
133
Serious AEs
19.6%
Results posted
Jul 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Successful Revascularization — 92.0 percentage of lesions — p=<0.05

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
SilverHawk™ LS-C, TurboHawk™ LS-C, TurboHawk™ LX-C plaque excision systems and SpiderFX™ embolic protection device (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Medtronic Endovascular
Primary completion
Nov 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Successful Revascularization
92.0 <0.05 sig
PRIMARY
Major Adverse Event Free Rate 30 Days
93.1
SECONDARY
Technical Procedural Success
88.6
SECONDARY
Residual Diameter Stenosis
64.1
SECONDARY
Presence of Debris in Deployed SpiderFx™ Embolic Protection Device
88.4
SECONDARY
Preservation of Run-off Distal to the Filter
98.3

Summary

This is a multi-center, non-randomized, single arm study of the SilverHawk™ /TurboHawk™ plaque excision systems when used in conjunction with SpiderFX™ embolic protection device in treatment of moderate to severely calcified peripheral arterial disease in the superficial femoral and/or popliteal arteries.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Provides written informed consent
  • Willing to comply with follow-up evaluations at specified times
  • Has leg pain due to peripheral arterial disease
  • Disease located within the femoropopliteal artery
  • Moderate to severe calcification

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previously implanted stent(s) or stent graft(s) in target leg
  • Life expectancy less than 12 months
  • Has any planned surgical or endovascular intervention of target vessel 30 days before or after index procedure
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00733135). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search