Phase 4
N=108
Evaluation of EULAR-RAID Score in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00768053 ↗Enrolled (actual)
108
Serious AEs
4.6%
Results posted
Apr 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Reliability of the European League Against Rheumatism - Rheumatism Arthritis Impact of Disease (EULAR-RAID) Score — 0.85 intraclass correlation coefficient — p=0.000
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Interventions
- Etanercept (Drug)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Reliability of the European League Against Rheumatism - Rheumatism Arthritis Impact of Disease (EULAR-RAID) Score |
0.85 | 0.000 sig |
| PRIMARY Simplicity: Time for Completion of the EULAR-RAID Questionnaire |
— | — |
| PRIMARY Face Validity: Correlation Coefficients of the EULAR-RAID Score With the Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28) |
0.33; 0.64 | <0.001 sig |
| PRIMARY Face Validity: Correlation Coefficients of the EULAR-RAID Score With the Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28): Week 12 |
0.55 | <0.001 sig |
| PRIMARY Face Validity: Correlation Coefficients of the EULAR-RAID Score With the Disease Activity Score Based on 28-joints Count (DAS28): Time-normalized Average |
0.59 | <0.001 sig |
| PRIMARY Face Validity: Correlation Coefficients of the EULAR-RAID Score With the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Health Status |
0.77; 0.93 | <0.001 sig |
| PRIMARY Face Validity: Correlation Coefficients of the EULAR-RAID Score With the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Health Status: Week 12 |
0.89 | <0.001 sig |
| PRIMARY Face Validity: Correlation Coefficients of the EULAR-RAID Score With the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Health Status: Time-normalized Average |
0.92 | <0.001 sig |
| PRIMARY Sensitivity to Change of the EULAR-RAID Score: Change From Baseline to Week 4 |
-1.01; -1.06; -1.02; -0.86; -0.64; -0.90 | <0.001 sig |
| PRIMARY Sensitivity to Change of the EULAR-RAID Score: Change From Baseline to Week 12 |
-1.37; -1.37; -1.24; -1.15; -0.92; -1.27 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving a Moderate or Good EULAR Response Rate at Week 12 |
87.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) of the EULAR-RAID Score: 75th Percentile of Change at Week 4 and Week 12 |
-0.19; -1.29 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) Score at Week 4 Who Had Moderately or Slightly Important Improvement at Week 4, Week 12, or Last Observation (Last Obs) |
78.4; 87.9; 87.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Improvement Score at Week 12 Who Had Moderately or Slightly Important Improvement at Week 4, Week 12, or Last Observation (Last Obs) |
61.8; 78.8; 76.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) of the EULAR-RAID Score: 75th Percentile of Change at Week 4 and Week 12 |
4.15; 3.27 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Score at Week 4 Who Had an Acceptable Symptom State at Week 4, Week 12, or Last Observation (Last Obs) |
57.8; 74.7; 72.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving a Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Score at Week 12 Who Had an Acceptable Symptom State at Week 4, Week 12, or Last Observation (Last Obs) |
49.0; 64.6; 62.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving > 1.2 Improvement in DAS28 at Week 12 |
77.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving Remission (DAS28 <2.6) at Week 12 |
28.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving Low Disease Activity (DAS28 ≤3.2) at Week 12 |
46.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving > 0.6 DAS28 Response at Week 12 |
91.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Time to Achievement of Sustained Low Disease Activity Score (LDAS): DAS28 ≤3.2 |
— | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 12 |
71.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Week 12 |
47.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 Response at Week 12 |
16.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 90 Response at Week 12 |
3.0 | — |
Summary
The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is a system of measurement developed in the 1980s that uses certain criteria, including joint counts and patient perceived disease activity, to measure disease activity in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis . More recently, the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) has developed a new system of measurement known as the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, or EULAR-RAID score. The EULAR-RAID score is a composite score based on patient reported outcomes, and includes such criteria as pain, functional disability, fatigue, sleep disturbances, coping, overall assessment of physical well being and overall assessment of psychological well being. The objective of this study is to evaluate the practical modalities and performance of the EULAR- RAID score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have been prescribed etanercept as part of usual medical practice.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patient aged up to or equal 18 years
- Meet the 1987 ACR Revised Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
- Active rheumatoid arthritis with a DAS greater than 3,2 and one of the two followings : Objective evidence of 4 clinical synovitis or CRP (plasma C-reactive protein) greater than 10 mg/l or ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) greater than 28 mm/h
- Failure of MTX, taken for at least 3 months and at least 15 mg/wk or maximal tolerated dosage . In patients with contraindications or intolerance to MTX, failure of another drug with structural efficacy (leflunomide or sulfasalazine), taken for at least 3 months at the optimal tolerated dosage Concomitant treatment for RA : DMARDs, corticosteroids, NSAIDs and analgesics are permitted. DMARDs and corticosteroids should be stable between screening and baseline visits.
- Functional status Class I, II or III as defined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Revised Criteria.
- Negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-HCG) pregnancy test at screening for all women of childbearing potential. Sexually active women of childbearing potential must use a medically acceptable form of contraception. Medically acceptable forms of contraception include oral contraceptives, injectable or implantable methods, intrauterine devices, or properly used barrier contraception. Sexually active men must agree to use a medically accepted form of contraception during the study.
- Able and willing to self-inject ETN or have a designee who can do so.
- Able to store injectable test article at 2 Celcius degree to 8 Celcius degree
Exclusion Criteria
- Prior experience of biologic treatment for their RA including ETN.
- Sepsis or risk of sepsis.
- Current or recent infections, including chronic or localized.
- Planned orthopedic surgery within 3 months (for RA disease)
- History of orthopedic surgery 1 month before screening
- Latex sensitivity.
- Vaccination with live vaccine in the last 4 weeks, or expected to require such vaccination during the course of the study.
- Previous clinical trial involvement in the last 3 months.
- Patients with the following conditions or risk factors should only be entered into the study if the investigator has conducted and documented a full risk/benefit evaluation
- History of recurring or chronic infection, or underlying condition which may predispose patients to infections e.g. tuberculosis (TB) infection (Note: follow SmPC and French guidelines for appropriate screening and treatment of TB in the setting of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. Patients with latent TB (contact with TB patients, history of primary TB, intradermal test with 5 IU of tuberculin greater than 5 mm, or radiographic lung density greater than 1 cm and consistent with TB) should receive appropriate prophylactic therapy as recommended by the French Agency for healthcare Product Safety (AFSSAPS, http//afassaps.sante.fr/), serious infection (infection associated with hospitalization and/or intravenous antibiotics) within 1 month of test article administration or active infection at screening, open cutaneous ulcers, known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive.
- Current or prior history of blood dyscrasias. Abnormal safety baseline blood test e.g. hemoglobin <= 85 g/L; hematocrit less than 27 %; platelet count less than 125 x 109/L; white blood cell count less than 3.5 x 109/L; serum creatinine greater than 175 µmol/L; aspartate aminotransferase (AST [SGOT]) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT [SGPT]) greater than 2 times the laboratory's upper limit of normal.
- Pre-existing or recent onset central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease.
- Cardiovascular conditions, e.g., myocardial infarction within 12 months of the screening visit, unstable angina pectoris, class III or IV congestive heart failure as defined by the New York Heart Association classification or decompensated congesti
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00768053). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.