Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=72 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Dilapan Versus Laminaria

Cervical Preparation

Enrolled (actual)
72
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Procedure Time — 5.9; 8.1 minutes

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
laminaria (Device); Dilapan-S (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Primary completion
Dec 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Procedure Time
5.9; 8.1
SECONDARY
Participants Who Experienced Complications or Need for Additional Dilation
10; 7; 2; 3; 1; 0

Summary

This is a randomized, blinded clinical trial comparing overnight laminaria versus same-day Dilapan for cervical preparation for surgical abortions occurring between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation. Comparisons will be made between procedure time, need for additional dilation, occurrence of complications, and patient and provider satisfaction. Hypothesis: Cervical preparation for surgical abortion, between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation, with same-day Dilapan is non-inferior to cervical preparation with overnight laminaria within a five-minute difference. Primary objective: Determine differences in procedure times Secondary objectives: Examine complications, and need for additional dilation between early second-trimester surgical abortions performed after cervical preparation with same-day Dilapan versus those performed after cervical preparation with overnight laminaria

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy between fourteen and eighteen weeks gestation
  • Request for elective abortion and certainty of decision to proceed

Exclusion Criteria

  • Incarceration
  • Minor status (women younger than eighteen years)
  • Allergy to Dilapan or laminaria
  • Inability to speak and understand Spanish or English
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00775983). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search