N/A
N=50
One-Lung Ventilation in the Morbidly Obese Patient: Comparison of Double Lumen Versus Bronchial Blockers
Obesity
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00813176 ↗Enrolled (actual)
50
Serious AEs
10.0%
Results posted
Jun 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Time Taken for Endotracheal Tube Placement Procedure. — 3.4; 4.1 minutes
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Double Lumen Endotracheal Tube (Device); Arndt Bronchial Blocker (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Javier H Campos
- Primary completion
- Dec 2008
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Time Taken for Endotracheal Tube Placement Procedure. |
3.4; 4.1 | — |
| PRIMARY Number of Participants in Which the Tube Was Successfully Positioned at First Attempt |
22; 23 | — |
| SECONDARY Effectiveness of Lung Collapse |
16; 17; 7; 7; 1; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Time Required to Collapse the Lung |
18; 15.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Successful Reinflation |
24; 25 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Intraoperative Oxygenation During One-lung Ventilation |
16.8; 18.6 | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the double-lumen endotracheal tube or the standard single-lumen tracheal tube, with an Arndt® blocker, is superior in providing one lung ventilation during thoracic surgery.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Subject undergoing thoracic or esophageal surgery requiring one-lung ventilation.
- Subject is >18 years of age.
- Subject's BMI > 35.
Exclusion Criteria
- Subject < 18 years of age.
- Subject's BMI < 35.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00813176). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.