Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=40 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization

Stroke · Carotid Stenosis

Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
27.5%
Results posted
Mar 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Transcranial Doppler Counts of Micro-embolic Signals in the Ipsilateral Middle Cerebral Artery. — 264; 339 Micro-emboli

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
closed-cell stent (Xact stent) (Device); Open-cell stent (Acculink carotid) (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Dallas VA Medical Center
Primary completion
Dec 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Transcranial Doppler Counts of Micro-embolic Signals in the Ipsilateral Middle Cerebral Artery.
264; 339
SECONDARY
Composite of Any Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death
SECONDARY
Subclinical Cerebral Embolization Assessed by Brain Diffusion-weighted MRI

Summary

The goal of the proposed study is to contrast the relative efficacy of closed-cell stents versus open-cell stents in preventing periprocedural cerebral embolization in high-risk patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject is at high risk for carotid endarterectomy due to either anatomic or co-morbid conditions; AND
  • Symptomatic patients (TIA or non-disabling stroke within 6 months of the procedure), with carotid stenosis ≥ 50% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology (50); OR
  • Asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis ≥ 80% as diagnosed by angiography, using NASCET methodology

Exclusion Criteria

  • Conditions that interfere with the evaluation of endpoints
  • Subject has anticipated or potential sources of cardiac emboli
  • Subject plans to have a major surgical procedure within 30 days after the index procedure.
  • Subject has intracranial pathology that makes the subject inappropriate for study participation.
  • Subject has a total occlusion of the ipsilateral carotid artery (i.e., CCA).
  • Severe circumferential lesion calcification that may restrict the full deployment of the carotid stent.
  • Carotid stenosis located distal to the target stenosis that is more severe than the target stenosis.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00830232). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search