Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=65

Snack Food Reinforcement in Obese and Non-obese Women

Obesity

Enrolled (actual)
65
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Responses Made by Clicking a Mouse Button for Food — 397.63; 288.36; 429.5; 213.2 Number of button presses

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
State University of New York at Buffalo
Primary completion
Jun 2008

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Responses Made by Clicking a Mouse Button for Food
397.63; 288.36; 429.5; 213.2; 448.36; 502.00
PRIMARY
Energy Intake
SECONDARY
Body Weight
SECONDARY
Height

Summary

Food reinforcement, motivation to obtain food, is associated with energy intake and obesity. Finding ways to decrease the reinforcing value of unhealthy foods may help with adherence to diets and weight loss. Our previous study in non-obese adults showed that daily consumption of the same snack food (food typically consumed outside of meals) for 14 days significantly decreased its reinforcing value. The purpose of this study was to replicate and extend these findings to obese individuals as well as to examine effects of different portion sizes of snack foods on food reinforcement. Thirty-one obese (body mass index > 30 kg/m2) and 27 non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) women had food reinforcement and liking tested at baseline and after two weeks of daily consumption of either 0 kcal, 100 kcals, or 300 kcals daily of the same snack food.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • women
  • non-smoker
  • not on a diet
  • no restrained eating
  • had to like potential snack foods
  • willing to visit the laboratory 3 times
  • willing to eat snacks provided
  • no medications or medical conditions that affect appetite
  • no food allergies

Exclusion Criteria

  • see above
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00837694). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search