Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=58 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate Foam Compared to Vehicle Foam

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00842153 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
58
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2012
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants With a Target Lesion Global Improvement (TLGI) Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4 — 6; 2; 19; 3 participants — p=0.1269

Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Clobetasol propionate to that of its Vehicle in the treatment of mild to moderate plaque-type psoriasis.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With a Target Lesion Global Improvement (TLGI) Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4
6; 2; 19; 3; 12; 2 0.1269
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a TLGI Score of 0, 1, 2, or 3 at Weeks 1, 2, and 4
19; 6; 21; 9; 15; 8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Pruritus (Overall) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
21; 17
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With an Erythema Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
6; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Scaling Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
11; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Plaque Thickness Score of 0 or 1 at Week 2
16; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Score of 0 or 1 for Subject Global Assessment at Week 2
5; 1
SECONDARY
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Pruritus (Target Lesion)
-30.5; 40.1
SECONDARY
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 2 in Percent (%) of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a TLGI Score of 0, 1, or 2 at Week 1 and Week 4
6; 2; 12; 2
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Pruritus (Overall) Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
8; 9; 19; 17
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With an Erythema Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
0; 0; 6; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Scaling Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
0; 0; 6; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Plaque Thickness Score of 0 or 1 at Baseline and Week 4
0; 0; 12; 2
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Score of 0 or 1 for Subject Global Assessment at Baseline and Week 4
0; 0; 7; 1
SECONDARY
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pruritus (Target Lesion)
-6.8; -40.2
SECONDARY
Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Percent (%) of Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Outpatient, male or female of any race, and at least 12 years of age. Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test result at baseline and practice a reliable method of contraception throughout the study.
  • Mild to moderate, plaque-type psoriasis
  • Target lesion on the trunk or extremities (excluding palms/soles, elbows, or knees) with a score of 2 or 3 for each of erythema, scaling and plaque thickness
  • Able to understand the requirements of the study and sign Informed Consent/HIPAA Authorization Forms. Subjects under the legal age of consent in the state where the study is conducted must also have the written, informed consent of a parent or legal guardian.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Female subjects who are pregnant (positive urine pregnancy test) breast feeding or who are of childbearing potential and not practicing a reliable method of birth control
  • Known allergy to clobetasol propionate or other topical corticosteroids; or to any component of the investigational formulations
  • Subjects who have not complied with the proper wash-out periods for prohibited medications
  • Medical condition that in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates the subject's participation in the clinical study
  • Skin disease/disorder that might interfere with the study related diagnosis or evaluations
  • Evidence of recent alcohol or drug abuse
  • History of poor cooperation, non-compliance with medical treatment or unreliability
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00842153). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search