Phase 4
Completed N=137
Double Blinded Randomized Trial Between Lidocaine And Plain Gel For Urethral Straight Catheterization And The Q-Tip Test
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00883103 ↗Enrolled (actual)
137
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2011
Primary outcomePrimary: Patient's Perception of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Visual Scale: 0 - no Pain; 5 - Worst Imaginable Pain — 1; 2 Scores on a scale — p=<0.001
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the pain perception between lidocaine and plain aqueous gel during assessment of postvoid residual volume and the Q-tip test.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Patient's Perception of Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Visual Scale: 0 - no Pain; 5 - Worst Imaginable Pain |
1; 2 | <0.001 sig |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- All women who presented to a single urogynecologist's office for an initial consultation with a complaint of urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse
Exclusion Criteria
- Being a minor
- Pregnancy
- Allergy to Lidocaine or aqueous lubricant gel
- Any current use of analgesia
- Structural abnormalities of the urethra
- Active genital Herpes or other vulvovaginal infections or inability to cooperate with pain assessment due to mental disorders.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00883103). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.