Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=324 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

A Study Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Teriflunomide and Interferon Beta-1a in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00883337 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
324
Serious AEs
10.6%
Results posted
Nov 2012
Primary outcomePrimary: Core Treatment Period: Overview of Failures — 53; 42; 44; 56 participants

Summary

Primary objective was to assess the effectiveness evaluated by the time to failure of two doses of teriflunomide in comparison to interferon beta-1a in participants with relapsing Multiple Sclerosis [MS]. Secondary objectives were: * To assess the effect of the two doses in comparison to interferon beta-1a on: * Frequency of relapses, * Fatigue, * Participant's satisfaction with treatment. * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the two doses in comparison to interferon beta-1a. The study consisted of a core treatment period with a common end date defined as 48 weeks after randomization of the last participant, followed by an optional long-term extension treatment period until teriflunomide is commercially available in accordance with local regulations.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Core Treatment Period: Overview of Failures
53; 42; 44; 56; 69; 60
PRIMARY
Core Treatment Period: Time to Failure: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Rate of Failure at Timepoints
25.7; 24.3; 29.8; 35.8; 33.3; 36.5 0.5953
SECONDARY
Core Treatment Period: Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR] - Poisson Regression Estimates
0.410; 0.259; 0.216
SECONDARY
Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score
0.97; 4.10; 9.10
SECONDARY
Core Treatment Period: Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [TSQM] Scores
67.25; 63.13; 59.30; 95.29; 93.15; 71.38
SECONDARY
Core Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse Events [AE]
103; 102; 97; 12; 6; 7
SECONDARY
Extension Treatment Period: Overview of AEs
83; 76; 48; 9; 13; 12
SECONDARY
Extension Treatment Period: ARR Poisson Regression Estimates
0.236; 0.193; 0.252

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Relapsing form of MS meeting McDonald's criteria for MS diagnosis and Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score ≤5.5 at screening visit.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Significantly impaired bone marrow function or, significant anemia, leukopenia or thrombocytopenia;
  • Persistent significant or severe infection.
  • Liver function impairment or known history of hepatitis.
  • Use of adrenocorticotrophic hormone [ACTH] or systemic corticosteroids for 2 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] positive.
  • Prior use of Rebif®, or prior or concomitant use of other interferons in the 3 months prior to randomization.
  • Prior or concomitant use of cladribine, mitoxantrone, or other immunosuppressant agents such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, methotrexate, mycophenolate, or natalizumab.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding woman.

Extension criteria:

The participants who met all the following criteria at the end of the core study period were eligible for enrolment into the open-label extension phase:

  • Participants who had not discontinued treatment in the core period and who had a minimum treatment of 48 weeks and completed the EOT visit (Visit 18).
  • Participants who had not met criteria for treatment withdrawal.
  • An informed consent must be obtained in writing from the participant for this open-label extension phase prior to entering and prior to completion of any extension phase procedure.
  • Participants who demonstrated a willingness and ability to roll over to the extension phase with the opportunity to continue treatment on 14 mg/day of teriflunomide under open-label.

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00883337). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search