Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=23 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Autotitrating Versus Standard Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) in Newly Diagnosed Patients

Nocturnal Hypoventilation · Neuromuscular Disease · Chest Wall Disorder

Enrolled (actual)
23
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Overnight Mean Oxygen Saturation — 96; 96 % SaO2 — p=0.13

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
AutoVPAP (Device); VPAPIIIST-A (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
ResMed
Primary completion
Mar 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Overnight Mean Oxygen Saturation
96; 96 0.13
SECONDARY
Overnight Mean Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide
6.5; 6.2 0.54
SECONDARY
Overnight Peak Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide
7.1; 6.9 0.94
SECONDARY
Oxygen Desaturation Index (>4%)
2.5; 5.0 0.42
SECONDARY
Sleep Quality: Arousal Index
17; 14 0.82

Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of autotitrating non-invasive ventilation (NIV) versus standard NIV in patients with newly diagnosed nocturnal hypoventilation who have never experienced nocturnal, home NIV.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • new clinical diagnosis of nocturnal hypoventilation
  • requirement for long-term domiciliary non-invasive ventilation
  • no previous experience with domiciliary non-invasive ventilation

Exclusion Criteria

  • uncontrolled cardiac failure
  • acute exacerbation of respiratory failure
  • daytime resting PaO2 < 7.5kPa
  • moderate or severe bulbar weakness
  • inability to understand rationale and/or consent form for study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00901485). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search