Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=212 Randomized Single-blind Health Services Research

Patient and Provider Outcomes of E-Learning Training in Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality

Suicide

Enrolled (actual)
212
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Provider Self-efficacy and Beliefs About Suicidality — 45.6; 44.9; 43.0 units on a scale — p=<0.01

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
CAMS (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Primary completion
Jul 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Provider Self-efficacy and Beliefs About Suicidality
45.6; 44.9; 43.0 <0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Satisfaction With Training
66; 62; 3; 2; 1; 5

Summary

Suicide prevention among military Veterans has become a national priority; yet, there is a gap in suicide-specific intervention training for mental health students and professionals. The need for training in this area has become even more acute with the recent hiring by the Veterans Health Affairs (VHA) of thousands of clinicians to address the mental health needs of Veterans from all war eras. Since e-learning (online) education is more effective than traditional in-person (face-to-face) education for adult learners when methods, such as blended learning, are used, this mode of delivery may more easily meet the training and continuing education needs of busy medical professionals who may find it easier to fit online education into their daily schedules. A well developed in-person training approach known as the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (or CAMS) has been recommended in systematic reviews as an effective tool for assessing and managing suicidality, as well as decreasing providers' fears, improving their attitudes, increasing their knowledge, confidence, and competence, and dispelling myths. The overall aims of this project were to develop an e-learning alternative for the CAMS program, determine its effectiveness relative to in-person CAMS training, and assess factors that may relate to adoption and implementation of CAMS in general and specifically through e-learning and in-person modalities.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Mental health providers, psychiatrist, social workers, psychologist, advanced practice nurses and case managers

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous CAMS Training
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00905827). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search