Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=20 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Modified AutoSet Device vs Existing AutoSet Device, the Assessment of Efficacy and Subjective Comfort of the Treatment.

Sleep Apnea

Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index (AHI) — 1.69; 1.73 Events/Hour

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Nexus Flow Generator (Device); VPAP Flow Generator 25 (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
ResMed
Primary completion
Jun 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Apnoea-Hypopnoea Index (AHI)
1.69; 1.73
PRIMARY
Oxygen Desaturation Index
1.95; 1.68
SECONDARY
Comfort of Breathing
8.0; 7.0
SECONDARY
Satisfaction of Treatment
9.5; 8.0
SECONDARY
Refreshed Feel
9.0; 8.0

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the performance of the modified AutoSet device is equivalent or better than the existing AutoSet device (VPAP Auto) in the efficacy of the treatment and the subjective comfort.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged 18-80 years
  • Patients who are on CPAP therapy in AUTOSET mode for no less than 6 months
  • Patients who are using ResMed masks

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who are unable to provide written informed consent
  • Patients who are unable to comprehend written and spoken English
  • Patients who are using Bilevel PAP
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients who are suffering any of the following:
  • Acute respiratory infection
  • Acute sinusitis, otitis media or perforated eardrum
  • Pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum
  • Recent history of severe epistaxis requiring medical attention
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00906958). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search