Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=74 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Memory Reconsolidation Blockade as a Novel Intervention for Nicotine Dependence

Smoking Cessation

Enrolled (actual)
74
Serious AEs
1.4%
Results posted
Sep 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in the Skin Conductance Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery — 0.107; -0.040 µS — p=0.05

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Propranolol (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Primary completion
Jul 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in the Skin Conductance Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery
0.107; -0.040 0.05
PRIMARY
Change in Heart Rate (Beats Per Minute), Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery
0.877; 1.162
PRIMARY
Change in the Corrugator Muscle (EMG) Level, Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery
0.479; 1.464
SECONDARY
Change in Craving Level to Smoking Cues Caused by Smoking Cues, Measured Using Script Driven Imagery
5.52; 4.3

Summary

Smoking is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in the US. While approximately 70% of smokers attempt to quit each year, only 5-15% maintain abstinence for 12 months, even with effective pharmacological and psychological interventions. Novel therapies are needed for smoking cessation and relapse prevention. Previous studies show that early post-cessation craving or urge to smoke is a powerful predictor of relapse. A current model of the pathogenesis of addiction maintains that a substance of abuse causes a marked increase release in phasic dopamine release, which in turn strengthens or increases the salience of the memory of the drug experience, leading to a powerful and persistent memory that is easily activated, leading to drug craving and often to drug use. This highly salient memory is also implicated in the physiological arousal associated with craving responses to smoking cues. This process is thought to be implicated in relapse to drug use after even long periods of abstinence. Recent animal research indicates that retrieval returns a consolidated memory such as those associated with drug craving, to a labile state from which it must be restabilized to persist in a process termed reconsolidation. If memories of drug-related experiences are labile when reactivated, this could represent a window of opportunity in which the memory of drug use that underlies drug craving can be influenced pharmacologically. Our hypothesis is that post-reactivation administration of the B-adrenergic blocker, propranolol, following retrieval of drug-associated memories will reduce the strength or salience of the memory by influencing reconsolidation, a process called memory reconsolidation blockade. In this study we will test the hypothesis that a single dose of propranolol given one hour prior to smoking-related cue exposure (post-reactivation treatment) will decrease psychophysiological responses to smoking cues one week later and will predict clinical response to an ensuing series of 6 post-reactivation treatments with script-driven imagery and propranolol. In order to do so, we propose to conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of post-reactivation treatment with propranolol in 50 adult smokers. Outcome measures will include in physiological responses to smoking-related cues after one and six post-reactivation treatments and smoking behavior during the treatment and during a 3-month follow-up period.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion:

  • Healthy smokers aged 18-65 who have smoked at least 10 cigarettes/day for the past 3 months

Exclusion:

  • Age 65
  • Systolic blood pressure 15 at screening
  • Current participation in any additional nicotine dependence treatment.
  • An urgent need to stop smoking: subjects who receive placebo may not achieve optimal smoking cessation results.
  • Inability to understand the study's procedures, risks, and side effects, or to otherwise give informed consent for participation;
  • Subject candidate does not understand English
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00916721). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search