Phase 1
Completed N=75
Comparison of Ipilimumab Manufactured by 2 Different Processes in Participants With Advanced Melanoma
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00920907 ↗Enrolled (actual)
75
Serious AEs
66.7%
Results posted
Mar 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the Cmax of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population — 252.68; 251.26 μg/mL
Summary
The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare pharmacokinetics of ipilimumab manufactured by two different processes
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the Cmax of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population |
252.68; 251.26 | — |
| PRIMARY Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Day 21, AUC(0-21d), of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the AUC(0-21d) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population |
40374.47; 40085.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Time of Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the Tmax of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population |
2.00; 2.50 | — |
| SECONDARY Terminal Elimination Half Life (T-HALF) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the T-HALF of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population |
15.45; 15.23 | — |
| SECONDARY Clearance (CLT) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the CLT of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population |
12.590; 12.934 | — |
| SECONDARY Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process C Relative to the Vss of Ipilimumab Manufactured by Process B - Evaluable Pharmacokinetic Population |
6.06; 5.96 | — |
| SECONDARY Best Overall Tumor Response Per Investigator Based on Modified World Health Organization (mWHO) Criteria - All Randomized Participants |
0; 1; 4; 10; 11; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Best Overall Tumor Response Per Investigator Based on Immune-related (ir) Response Criteria (RC) - All Randomized Participants |
0; 1; 2; 9; 11; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Median Overall Survival Following First Ipilimumab Dose - All Treated Participants |
20.58; 24.79 | — |
| SECONDARY Model Estimates of Mean Absolute Lymphocyte Count at Each Nominal Ipilimumab Induction Dose and at End of the Induction Dosing Period |
1.26; 1.18; 1.67; 1.74; 1.79; 1.86 | 0.85 |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation |
37; 38; 33; 36; 22; 24 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Who Developed Antibodies and Neutralizing Antibodies |
0; 2; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure - All Treated Participants up to Data Cutoff |
-1.6; -1.4; -7.0; -5.6; 7.5; 2.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Mean Change From Baseline in Sitting Pulse Rate - All Treated Participants up to Data Cutoff |
-4.3; -3.3; -7.7; -7.1; 25.5; 12.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With 2-Grade or Greater Shift From Baseline (Worsening) in Hematology Laboratory Safety Tests - All Treated Participants |
2; 3; 3; 3; 0; 2 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With 2-Grade or Greater Shift From Baseline (Worsening) in Chemistry Laboratory Safety Tests (Non-electrolyte) - All Treated Participants |
2; 1; 2; 1; 2; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With 2-Grade or Greater Shift From Baseline (Worsening) in Electrolyte Laboratory Safety Tests - All Treated Participants |
4; 6; 1; 2; 0; 1 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Histologic diagnosis of malignant melanoma
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1
- Measurable/evaluable disease per modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria
Exclusion Criteria
- Active Brain Metastasis
- Primary ocular or mucosal melanoma
- Prior Autoimmune disease
- Inadequate hematologic, hepatic or renal function
- Use of immunosuppressants
- Prior treatment with a CD137 agonist or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00920907). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.