Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=829 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

A Study Investigating the Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (MK-0476-192)(COMPLETED)

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Enrolled (actual)
829
Serious AEs
0.1%
Results posted
Jun 2010
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score — -0.32; -0.38; -0.47 Units on a Scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
montelukast sodium (Drug); Comparator: loratadine (Drug); Comparator: placebo (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 15+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Organon and Co
Primary completion
Oct 2000

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score
-0.32; -0.38; -0.47
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score
-0.18; -0.28; -0.26
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score
-0.23; -0.29; -0.35
SECONDARY
Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis
2.62; 2.43; 2.27
SECONDARY
Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis
2.53; 2.35; 2.26
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score
-0.75; -0.85; -0.97

Summary

A study of the ability of montelukast to improve signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with placebo. Loratadine is included in the study as an active control.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient has a documented clinical history of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms that become worse during the study season
  • Patient is a non-smoker
  • Patient is in good mental and physical health

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient is hospitalized
  • Patient is a woman who is <8 weeks postpartum or is breast feeding
  • Patient intends to move or vacation away during the study
  • Patient is a current or past abuser of alcohol or illicit drugs
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00960141). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search