Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=21 Randomized Quadruple-blind

Effect of Veramyst and Olopatadine 0.2% Opthalmic Solution on Allergy Symptoms

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Enrolled (actual)
21
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Total Eye Symptoms Score Difference — 6; 0; 2.5; 1.5 units on a scale — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
PL nasal spray (Drug); fluticasone furoate (FF) (Drug); PL eye drops (Drug); olopatadine (OLO) (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Chicago
Primary completion
Apr 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Total Eye Symptoms Score Difference
6; 0; 2.5; 1.5 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Total Nasal Symptoms Score Difference
17; 10; 9; 9 0.05
SECONDARY
Total Number of Sneezes
10; 2.5; 2.5; 1.0 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Histamine Level (Across Nasal Challenges)
5.9; 0.3; 11.4; 3.4 0.11
SECONDARY
Change in Tryptase Level (Across Nasal Challenges)
5; 0; 2; 0 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Total Number of Eosinophils
7883; 238; 9606; 311

Summary

People who have hayfever or allergic rhinitis often complain about eye symptoms associated with their nasal symptoms. How people with hayfever develop eye symptoms is not clear. The purpose of this study is to better understand the generation of eye symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis. We have previously shown that placing the substance that subjects are allergic to in their nose causes both nose and eye symptoms. This can be explain by a parasympathetic neurogenic reflex from the nose to the eye. Such a reflex would readily explain the tearing and watery eye symptoms, but does not explain the itch. In this study, we are going to address one possible explanation for the itch; does an axonal neurogenic reflex stimulate mast cells in the eye to release histamine, which then causes the itch? We will do this by placing an antihistamine drop in the eye and challenge the nose with allergen. We will also attempt to demonstrate that mast activation isn't effected by blocking the initiating of the reflex with a nasal steroid, as done in our previous study, and showing that the addition of an antihistamine does not add to the reduction of symptoms.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males and females between 18 and 45 years of age.
  • History of grass and/or ragweed allergic rhinitis.
  • Positive skin test to grass and/or ragweed antigen.
  • Positive response to screening nasal challenge.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Physical signs or symptoms suggestive of renal, hepatic or cardiovascular disease.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Upper respiratory infection within 14 days of study start.
  • forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) <80% of predicted at screening for subjects with history of mild asthma.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01007253). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search