Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=239 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Study of Lenalidomide Versus Placebo in Subjects With Transfusion Dependent Anemia in Lower Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Without Del 5q

Anemia

Enrolled (actual)
239
Serious AEs
32.6%
Results posted
Jun 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for ≥ 56 Days as Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) — 2.5; 26.9 percentage of participants — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Lenalidomide (Drug); Placebo (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Celgene
Primary completion
Mar 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion Independence for ≥ 56 Days as Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)
2.5; 26.9 <0.001 sig
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With a Erythroid Gene Signature Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence for ≥ 56 Days as Determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC)
0.0; 7.1 1.000
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved RBC Transfusion Independence With a Duration of ≥ 24 Weeks (168 Days) as Determined by the Sponsor
0.0; 17.5 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimates of Duration of 56-day RBC Transfusion Independence Response as Determined by the Sponsor
NA; 30.9 0.639
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Erythroid Response Based on the Modified International Working Group (IWG) 2006 Criteria
30.4; 38.8 0.252
SECONDARY
Time to 56-Day RBC-Transfusion-Independent (TI) Response as Determined by the Sponsor
0.3; 10.1
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimates for Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
NA; NA 0.864
SECONDARY
Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival (OS)
3.0; 3.8 0.980
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
74; 160; 42; 144; 3; 40
SECONDARY
Compliance Rates Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) From Baseline to Week 48
88.6; 90; 78.5; 83.8; 80.6; 85.8 0.823
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain at Week 12 and 24
0.6; 2.4; 7.6; -1.5 0.323
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea Domain at Week 12 and 24
0.6; 2.2; 4.3; 1.2 0.760
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain at Week 12 and 24
-1.4; -2.1; -5.7; -0.4 0.424
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) Domain at Week 12 and 24
-2.1; -1.4; -4.1; -2.4 0.746
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain at Week 12 and 24
1.2; -1.4; -7.1; 0.8 0.265
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in Fatigue Domain Associated With the EORTC QLQ-C-30 Scale at Week 12 and Week 24
-0.464; 3.497; 7.376; 0.196 0.2909
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Dyspnea Domain Associated With the EORTC QLQ-C-30 Scale at Week 12 and Week 24
1.696; 3.374; 5.998; -0.206 0.6957
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Physical Functioning Domain Associated With the EORTC QLQ-C-30 Scale at Week 12 and Week 24
0.732; -2.919; -5.451; -1.484 0.3975
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Global Health Status/QoL Domain Associated With the EORTC QLQ-C-30 Scale at Week 12 and Week 24
-1.201; -2.690; -4.502; -2.441 0.6408
SECONDARY
Mean Change From Baseline in the Emotional Functioning Domain Associated With the EORTC QLQ-C30 Scale at Weeks 12 and 24
1.458; -1.876; -6.746; -1.129 0.2848
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in QOL (EORTC QLQ-C-30 Scale) From Baseline in Fatigue Domain at Weeks 12 and 24
30.4; 39.3; 29.8; 38.6 0.042 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in HRQOL Associated With the EORTC QLQ-C-30 Scale From Baseline in the Dyspnea Domain at Weeks 12 and 24
19.6; 21.3; 12.8; 20.5 0.825
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in HRQOL Associated With the EORTC QLQ-C-30 Scale From Baseline Within the Physical Functioning Domain at Weeks 12 and 24
26.8; 16.4; 12.8; 24.1 0.119
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in HRQOL Associated With the EORTC QLQ-C-30 Scale From Baseline in the Global Health Status/QOL Domain at Weeks 12 and 24
19.6; 22.1; 14.9; 26.5 0.792
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in HRQOL Associated With the EORTC QLQ-C-30 Scale From Baseline in the Emotional Functioning Domain at Weeks 12 and 24
25.0; 20.5; 17.0; 21.7 0.476
SECONDARY
Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Rate of Inpatient Hospitalizations Related to Adverse Events Per Person Year
0.47; 0.77
SECONDARY
Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Duration of Hospitalizations Due to Adverse Events
9.0; 11.0
SECONDARY
Healthcare Resource Utilization (HRU): Number of Days of Hospitalization Due to Adverse Events Per Person-Years
6.37; 8.92

Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether lenalidomide would reduce the number of red blood cell transfusions (RBC) needed in anemic (RBC transfusion-dependent) participants with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS without a deletion 5q chromosome abnormality. The study also investigated the safety of lenalidomide use in these participants. Two-thirds of the participants received oral lenalidomide and one-third of the participants received oral placebo.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of low or intermediate-1 risk Myelodysplastic (MDS) with any chromosome karyotype except del 5q[31]
  • Anemia that requires red blood cell transfusions
  • Resistant to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) or blood erythropoietin level > 500 mU/mL
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) ≤ 2
  • Must agree to follow pregnancy precautions as required by the protocol.
  • Must agree to receive counseling related to teratogenic and other risks of lenalidomide
  • Must agree not to donate blood or semen
  • Must be willing to consent to two or more bone marrow aspirate procedures to be completed during study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects previously receiving immunomodulating or immunosuppressive agents, or epigenetic or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) modulation agents
  • Allergic reaction to thalidomide
  • Renal insufficiency creatinine clearance (CrC1) 3X upper limit of normal
  • Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism
  • Significant neuropathy
  • Prior stem cell transplantation
  • Anemia due to reasons other than MDS
  • History of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolus (PE) within past 3 years
  • Significant active cardiac disease within the past 6 months
  • Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection; known Hepatitis C infection or active Hepatitis B infection
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01029262). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search