Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=459 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tapentadol ER Compared With Placebo in Patients With Chronic, Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Enrolled (actual)
459
Serious AEs
3.6%
Results posted
May 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Double-Blind Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12 — 0.28; 1.3 units on a scale — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Tapentadol extended release (ER) (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Primary completion
Mar 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Double-Blind Baseline of the Average Pain Intensity Based on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12
0.28; 1.3 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Responder Analysis: Proportion of Patients With At Least 50% Improvement From Baseline of Open-Label on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at the Week 12 Endpoint
40.4; 28.9
SECONDARY
Distribution of Patient Global Impression of Change at Week 12 Endpoint
28.7; 14.4; 37.3; 30.9; 21.3; 20.9
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline of Open-Label in the Pain Intensity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) at the Week 12 Double-Blind Endpoint
-3.0; -2.3
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health Status Index at the Week 12 Endpoint
0.00; -0.10

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of orally administered tapentadol extended release (ER) at dosages of 100 to 250 mg twice daily compared with placebo in patients with moderate to severe pain due to chronic, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) who tolerated tapentadol (ER) and have an initial treatment effect (pain improvement) after a 3-week, open-label titration period.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus must have a documented clinical diagnosis of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy with symptoms and signs for at least 6 months, and pain present at the time of screening
  • Diagnosis must include pain plus reduction or absence of pin sensibility and/or vibration sensibility on Total Neuropathy Score - Nurse (TNSn) examination in lower and/or upper extremities at screening
  • The investigator considers the patient's blood glucose to be controlled by diet, or hypoglycemics, or insulin for at least 3 months prior to enrolling in the study
  • Patients have been taking analgesic medications for the condition for at least 3 months prior to screening (patients taking opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current treatment, and patients taking non-opioid analgesics must be dissatisfied with current analgesia)
  • Patients currently requiring opioid treatment must be taking daily doses of an opioid-based analgesic equivalent to <=160mg of oral morphine

Exclusion Criteria

  • Significant history of pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, metabolic (except diabetes mellitus), neurological, psychiatric disorders (resulting in disorientation, memory impairment or inability to report accurately as in schizophrenia)
  • History of moderate to severe hepatic impairment
  • Severely impaired renal function
  • Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease
  • History of seizure disorder or epilepsy
  • History of any other clinically significant disease that in the investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments or may compromise patient safety during study participation
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01041859). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search