Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 Completed N=255 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Study To Evaluate Efficacy And Safety Of An Additional Dose Of Celecoxib (YM177) In Patients With Post-Tooth Extraction Pain

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01062113 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
255
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2012
Primary outcomePrimary: Efficacy Rate (Percentage) of Patient's Impression — 64.1; 25.9 percentage of participants — p=<0.0001

Summary

To evaluate efficacy and safety of additional dose of celecoxib, as compared to placebo, in patients with post lateral mandibular impacted third molar tooth extraction pain.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Efficacy Rate (Percentage) of Patient's Impression
64.1; 25.9 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants in Each Pain Intensity (PI) With 4 Categories
11; 3; 34; 24; 18; 28
SECONDARY
Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
35.8; 51.9 0.0003 sig
SECONDARY
Differences in Pain Intensity (PI) Measured by VAS Among Participants
33.4; 12.3 <0.0001 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Initial dose:

  • 20 to 64 years
  • Patients with undergoing mandibular impacted third molar tooth extraction accompanied by lateral bone removal and crown cutting
  • Patients with pain that meets both of the following criteria
  • Pain intensity (4-categorical): "moderate pain" or "severe pain"
  • Pain intensity (VAS): 45.0 mm or more

Additional dose:

  • Patients with pain that corresponds to "4. Agree" or "5. Strongly agree" as the answer to the "question about the pain intensity" during the period from 5 hours to 12 hours post-initial dose of the study drug

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with acute inflammatory findings in the oral cavity necessitating treatment
  • Patients who are scheduled to receive general anesthesia and analgesics in the process of the eligible tooth extraction
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01062113). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search