Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=9 Randomized Basic Science

Lokomat Versus Strength Training in Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal Cord Injury

Enrolled (actual)
9
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: 10 Meter Walking at Preferred Speed — 0.04; 0.06 meters per second

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
RAGT (Device); Strength Training (Other)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 16+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Zurich
Primary completion
Sep 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
10 Meter Walking at Preferred Speed
0.04; 0.06
PRIMARY
10 Meter Walking at Maximal Speed
0.01; 0.14
SECONDARY
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II
0.78; 0.33
SECONDARY
Berg Balance Scale
1.11; 2.78
SECONDARY
Spinal Cord Independence Measure III
0.78; 1.33
SECONDARY
Mean Latency of the Averaged Motor Evoked Potentials of the Right and the Left M. Tibialis
0.43; 0.42
SECONDARY
Manual Muscle Test of the Lower Extremity
0.67; 1.00
SECONDARY
Pain on a Visual Analogue Scale
-4.5; -6.8
SECONDARY
Response Time of the Lower Extremities
-1.8; -17.6
SECONDARY
Falls Efficacy Scale
0.17; 0.56
SECONDARY
Figure of Eight Test
0.004; 0.04

Summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate whether gait specific robotic supported bodyweight supported treadmill training and lower extremity strength training have similar beneficial effects on walking function and other outcomes.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Time since lesion > 1 year
  • Outdoor mobility SCIM III 130 kg
  • cardiac pacemaker
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01087918). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search