Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=78 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Evaluation of 3 Intraocular Lenses Following Lens Extraction

Cataract

Enrolled (actual)
78
Serious AEs
5.4%
Results posted
Mar 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 1.5 and 3 Cycles/Degree — 1.494; 1.576; 1.410; 1.613 log contrast sensitivity units

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Crystalens AO (Device); ReSTOR (Device); Tecnis Multifocal IOL (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 40+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Primary completion
Jun 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 1.5 and 3 Cycles/Degree
1.494; 1.576; 1.410; 1.613; 1.679; 1.528
PRIMARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 6 Cycles/Degree
1.610; 1.622; 1.543
PRIMARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 12 Cycles/Degree
1.229; 1.218; 1.217
PRIMARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 18 Cycles/Degree
0.998; 0.789; 0.896
PRIMARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 1.5 Cycles/Degree
1.525; 1.588; 1.408
PRIMARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 3 Cycles/Degree
1.638; 1.698; 1.519
PRIMARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 6 Cycles/Degree
1.610; 1.622; 1.543
PRIMARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 12 Cycles/Degree
1.229; 1.218; 1.217
PRIMARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 18 Cycles/Degree
0.998; 0.789; 0.896
SECONDARY
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 1.5 & 3 Cycles/Degree
1.688; 1.749; 1.537; 1.775; 1.797; 1.667
SECONDARY
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 6 Cycles/Degree
1.731; 1.677; 1.593
SECONDARY
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 12 Cycles/Degree
1.261; 1.273; 1.235
SECONDARY
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 18 Cycles/Degree
1.160; 1.008; 0.885
SECONDARY
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 1.5, 3, 6 Cycles/Degree
1.712; 1.743; 1.537; 1.785; 1.768; 1.594
SECONDARY
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 12 Cycles/Degree
1.261; 1.273; 1.235
SECONDARY
Binocular Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity Without Glare 18 Cycles/Degree
1.160; 1.008; 0.885
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 1.5 Cycles/Degree
1.343; 1.367; 1.199
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 3 Cycles/Degree
1.536; 1.462; 1.367
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 6 Cycles/Degree
1.535; 1.475; 1.413
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 12 Cycles/Degree
1.341; 1.272; 1.190
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 18 Cycles/Degree
1.139; 1.192; 0.849
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 1.5 Cycles/Degree
1.343; 1.367; 1.199
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 3 Cycles/Degree
1.536; 1.462; 1.367
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 6 Cycles/Degree
1.535; 1.475; 1.413
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 12 Cycles/Degree
1.341; 1.272; 1.190
SECONDARY
Mesopic Monocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 18 Cycles/Degree
1.139; 1.192; 0.849
SECONDARY
Mesopic Binocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree
1.392; 1.404; 1.344; 1.573; 1.493; 1.410
SECONDARY
Mesopic Binocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 6 Cycles/Degree
1.519; 1.515; 1.448
SECONDARY
Mesopic Binocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 12 Cycles/Degree
1.321; 1.319; 1.337
SECONDARY
Mesopic Binocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 18 Cycles/Degree
1.175; 1.101; 1.060
SECONDARY
Mesopic Binocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 1.5, 3 Cycles/Degree
1.392; 1.404; 1.344; 1.573; 1.493; 1.410
SECONDARY
Mesopic Binocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 6 Cycles/Degree
1.519; 1.515; 1.448
SECONDARY
Mesopic Binocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 12 Cycles/Degree
1.321; 1.319; 1.337
SECONDARY
Mesopic Binocular Contrast Sensitivity With Glare 18 Cycles/Degree
1.175; 1.101; 1.060
SECONDARY
Optical Scatter
1.1308; 1.9760; 1.8318
SECONDARY
Optical Scatter
1.1308; 1.9760; 1.8318
SECONDARY
Monocular Halo and Starburst
1.2; 1.5; 1.8; 4.6; 4.7; 4.5
SECONDARY
Monocular Halo and Starburst
1.2; 1.5; 1.8; 4.6; 4.7; 4.5
SECONDARY
Binocular Halo and Starburst
1.3; 1.8; 2.0; 4.6; 4.9; 4.5
SECONDARY
Binocular Halo and Starburst
1.3; 1.8; 2.0; 4.6; 4.9; 4.5
SECONDARY
Manifest Refraction
-0.339; 0.145; -0.091
SECONDARY
Manifest Refraction
-0.339; 0.145; -0.091
SECONDARY
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity
0.122; 0.002; 0.072; 0.113; 0.016; 0.060
SECONDARY
Best-corrected Distance Visual Acuity
-0.100; -0.094; -0.068; -0.100; -0.096; -0.075

Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and subject satisfaction with three different FDA approved lenses for adults over 40 years of age who desire a reduction in spectacle dependence.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects must have a clinically documented diagnosis of age-related bilateral cataracts that are considered amenable to treatment with standard phacoemulsification cataract extraction.
  • Subjects must require a spherical lens power from 10.00 D to 33.00 D
  • Subjects must have the potential for corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/32 or better in both eyes, as documented by a Potential Acuity Meter

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with conditions with increased risk of zonular rupture, such as pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Zonular rupture during cataract surgery may affect postoperative centration, tilt, and stability of the lens.
  • Subjects who have any active inflammation or edema (swelling) of the cornea, including but not limited to the following: keratitis, keratoconjunctivitis, and keratouveitis.
  • Subjects with visually significant diabetic retinopathy (proliferative or non-proliferative) which reduces potential acuity to 20/32 or worse.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01122576). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search