Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=434 Randomized Prevention

Guangdong Uptake of Surgery Trial

Cataract

Enrolled (actual)
434
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Decision to Undergo Cataract Surgery (Surgery Acceptance) — 31.1; 34.2 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Video and counseling for cataract patients (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Sun Yat-sen University
Primary completion
Jun 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Decision to Undergo Cataract Surgery (Surgery Acceptance)
31.1; 34.2
SECONDARY
Attendance at Hospital for Pre-operative Examination
40.1; 41.4
SECONDARY
Knowledge That Cataract Can be Treated
87.7; 79.7
SECONDARY
Belief That Surgery Will be Painful
48.1; 57.7
SECONDARY
Belief That Vision Will Improve "a Lot" Following Surgery
62.0; 54.0
SECONDARY
Belief That Surgeons at the Hospital Are "Highly Skilled"
74.1; 79.4
SECONDARY
Belief That Doctors and Nurses at the Hospital Have "Very Good" Attitudes
81.9; 82.9

Summary

The purpose of this study is: 1. To determine whether an educational intervention designed based on studies in the area is effective in increasing acceptance of surgery and presentation to the hospital, when adjusting for a number of potential determinants of service uptake; 2. To assess short-term impact of the educational intervention on knowledge about cataract and attitudes toward locally-available surgical services.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • thought by the examiner to have age-related or myopic cataract in one or both eyes
  • pinhole-corrected visual acuity less than or equal to 6/18.

Exclusion Criteria

  • traumatic cataract
  • inability to give informed consent due to dementia or other reasons.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01123928). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search