N/A
N=131
Use of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy
Laryngeal Mask Airway · Tonsillectomy
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01141660 ↗Enrolled (actual)
131
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Jan 2011
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Laryngospasm — 8; 6 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Endotracheal Tube (Device); Laryngeal mask airway (Device)
- Age
- Pediatric · 2+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Primary completion
- Aug 2009
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Participants With Laryngospasm |
8; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Postanesthesia Recovery Times |
95.59; 83.50 | — |
Summary
The aim of the current study is to compare the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal tube (ETT) in pediatric adenotonsillectomy. The primary objective is to assess the incidence of post-operative laryngospasm between the LMA and ETT. The investigators also sought to compare anesthetic, operative, and recovery times in the LMA and ETT groups. We hypothesized that the LMA would be a safe efficient alternative to the ETT.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Children 2 to 12 years of age undergoing elective adenotonsillectomy for obstructive sleep apnea or chronic tonsillitis were included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- Exclusion criteria were as follows: Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 35 and craniofacial anomalies.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01141660). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.