Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=386 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Efficacy and Safety of a Herbal Medicinal Product (Dry Extract BNO 1016) in Patients With Acute Rhinosinusitis

Acute Rhinosinusitis

Enrolled (actual)
386
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Major Symptom Score (MSS) Assessed by the Investigator — 2.38; 3.41 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
BNO 1016 (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bionorica SE
Primary completion
Apr 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Major Symptom Score (MSS) Assessed by the Investigator
2.38; 3.41
SECONDARY
SNOT 20 Symptom Scores
11.02; 15.76
SECONDARY
Major Symptom Score Assessed by the Patient
2.62; 3.48
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients Classified as Responders by the Investigator on a 4-point Rating Scale
94.2; 87.4
SECONDARY
Ultrasonography of Paranasal Sinuses
26.8; 38.4

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the dry extract BNO 1016 is effective and safe in the treatment of acute rhinosinusitis in adults.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Diagnosis of acute rhinosinusitis

  • characterized by a major symptom score (MSS) ≥ 8 and ≤ 12 points (minimum 0, maximum 15 points)
  • individual score for facial pain/pressure ≥ 1 (mild) and ≤ 2 (moderate)
  • confirmed by ultrasonography of paranasal sinuses
  • with presence of symptoms ≤ 3 days prior to inclusion

Exclusion Criteria

  • Chronic rhinosinusitis
  • Polyposis nasi
  • Anatomical deviations of the nasal septum that significantly impair nasal and paranasal ventilation/airflow
  • Acute symptoms of a known allergic rhinitis
  • Patients with asthma who have a history of exacerbations within 30 days prior to study inclusion
  • Signs or symptoms of fulminant bacterial sinusitis
  • Odontogenic sinusitis
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01146860). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search