N/A N=336 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

Ultra-Brief Versus Brief Hands Only CPR Video Training With and Without Psychomotor Skill Practice

Cardiac Arrest

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01191736 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

336

Serious AEs

—

Results posted

Oct 2010

Primary outcome: Primary: Median Compression Depth (mm) — 30; 41; 42; 48 millimeters — p=.05

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: No training, assessed within 60 mins (Behavioral); Ultra-brief video; assessed in 60 mins (Behavioral); Brief video; assessed in 60 mins (Behavioral); Brief video + hands-on; ass'd in 60 mins (Behavioral); Ultra-brief video; assessed at 2 months (Behavioral); Brief video; assessed 2 months later (Behavioral); Brief video + hands-on; ass'd 2 ms later (Behavioral)
Age: Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex: All
Sponsor: Valleywise Health
Primary completion: Nov 2009

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Median Compression Depth (mm)	30; 41; 42; 48; 43; 43	.05
SECONDARY The Proportion of Subjects Who Assessed the Responsiveness of the Victim (Manikin) as Judged by Expert Raters	.854; .182; .8; .978; .542; .780	.05

Summary

Bystander CPR improves survival from Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest. This study examines the efficacy of ultra-brief video training for Hands-Only CPR. Subjects were randomized to one of four training conditions, then assessed for CPR skills retention.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Members of a local area church

Exclusion Criteria

Less than 18 years old
formal CPR training or certification within last 2 years
Lacks fluency in English
Works as a health care provider

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01191736). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.