Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=505 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

PALACE 3: Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriatic Arthritis

Enrolled (actual)
505
Serious AEs
10.6%
Results posted
May 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16 — 18.3; 28.4; 40.7 percentage of participants — p=<0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Apremilast 20mg (Drug); Apremilast 30mg (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Amgen
Primary completion
Aug 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16
18.3; 28.4; 40.7 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16
-0.065; -0.131; -0.192 0.0073 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 20 Response at Week 24
15.4; 26.6; 31.1 0.0007 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24
-0.053; -0.137; -0.192 0.0050 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 16
1.14; 2.29; 3.47 0.0053 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 16
27.2; 37.9; 52.7 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 75% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Score (PASI75) at Week 16
7.9; 20.9; 22.2 0.0062 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 16
-4.9; -8.6; -12.7 0.0021 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 16
-0.7; -0.7; -1.0 0.5349
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 16
-1.3; -1.7; -2.1 0.0720
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 16
-2.76; -4.61; -7.70 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16
-0.28; -0.54; -0.74 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 16
1.18; 1.86; 3.72 0.0049 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 24
1.03; 2.71; 3.37 0.0043 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 24
23.1; 32.0; 44.3 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 75% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Score (PASI75) at Week 24
11.2; 22.2; 25.6 0.0099 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 24
-4.4; -8.2; -10.9 0.0080 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 24
-0.7; -1.0; -1.1 0.2761
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 24
-1.3; -1.7; -2.3 0.0399 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24
-2.53; -5.18; -7.81 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 24
-0.27; -0.57; -0.75 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24
0.83; 2.01; 3.27 0.0078 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 16
53.2; 48.5; 54.5 0.7585
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 16
59.2; 66.2; 71.3 0.1303
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16
29.0; 40.2; 51.5 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 24
51.4; 51.5; 54.5 0.5731
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 24
60.6; 67.6; 73.8 0.1172
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24
20.1; 32.0; 42.5 < 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 50 Response at Week 16
8.3; 12.4; 15.0 0.0520
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 16
2.4; 4.7; 3.6 0.5154
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 24
7.7; 13.6; 16.2 0.0180 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70 Response at Week 24
3.6; 4.1; 5.4 0.4230
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 16
24.8; 19.6; 20.5 0.4707
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 16
35.2; 40.8; 41.3 0.4175
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 24
28.4; 20.6; 27.7 0.9463
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 24
36.6; 45.1; 46.3 0.2321
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 20 Response at Week 52
59.3; 58.2; 56.0; 63.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
-0.34; -0.34; -0.33; -0.35
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale Score at Week 52
7.76; 6.87; 5.68; 5.87
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Modified PsARC Response at Week 52
81.1; 75.8; 71.6; 79.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving a ≥ 75% Improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Score (PASI75) at Week 52
33.3; 28.6; 28.6; 39.1
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Patient Assessment of Pain at Week 52
-19.9; -19.1; -14.9; -18.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 52
-2.5; -2.2; -2.2; -1.9
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 52
-3.1; -3.8; -2.9; -3.6
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the CDAI Score at Week 52
-13.54; -12.38; -12.86; -14.14
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the DAS28 at Week 52
-1.28; -1.29; -1.21; -1.41
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the FACIT-Fatigue Scale Score at Week 52
6.72; 5.66; 4.78; 6.20
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 52
73.5; 75.0; 77.3; 71.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 52
95.5; 92.3; 88.5; 91.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 52
64.8; 73.1; 69.4; 74.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 52
28.3; 31.8; 25.2; 30.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 52
20.8; 14.9; 9.2; 10.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 52
44.1; 43.8; 33.3; 36.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 52
68.2; 80.8; 75.0; 68.9
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Placebo-Controlled Phase
83; 100; 104; 33; 50; 62
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Apremilast Exposure Period
194; 64; 209; 98; 11; 111

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether apremilast is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis and a qualifying psoriasis lesion. Apremilast is proposed to improve signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis (tender and swollen joints, pain, physical function) in treated patients.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males or females, aged ≥ 18 years at time of consent.
  • Have a diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA, by any criteria) of ≥ 6 months duration.
  • Meet the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria for PsA at time of screening.
  • Must have been inadequately treated by disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
  • May not have axial involvement alone
  • Concurrent Tx allowed with methotrexate, leflunomide, or sulfasalazine
  • Have ≥ 3 swollen AND ≥ 3 tender joints.
  • Males & Females must use contraception
  • Stable dose of NSAIDs, narcotics and low dose oral corticosteroids allowed.
  • Have at least one ≥2 cm psoriasis lesion

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant or breast feeding.
  • History of allergy to any component of the investigational product Hepatitis B surface antigen and/or Hepatitis C antibody positive at screening.
  • Therapeutic failure on > 3 agents for PsA or > 1 biologic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01212770). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search