Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=376 Randomized Prevention

Diabetes Self-Management Models to Reduce Health Disparities

Type 2 Diabetes

Enrolled (actual)
376
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: HbA1c — 8.7; 8.7; 8.6; 8.4 percentage of gycosylated HbA1c — p=0.771

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
PDA (Behavioral); CDSMP (Behavioral); PDA/CDSMP (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Scott and White Hospital & Clinic
Primary completion
May 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
HbA1c
8.7; 8.7; 8.6; 8.4 0.771
SECONDARY
BMI
34.9; 35.8; 32.8; 33.9 0.2176
SECONDARY
Patient Self-reported Perceived Health Status
3; 0; 1; 1; 13; 3 0.572
SECONDARY
Diabetes-related Behaviors
0.26; -0.91; 0.10; 0.97; 0.55; -1.22 0.26
SECONDARY
Quality of Life (QOL)
5.9; 9.0; 8.5; 7.3; 6.8; 7.2 0.685

Summary

To evaluate the effectiveness of two different diabetes self-management approaches (Personal Digital Assistant-based intervention & Chronic Disease Self-Management Program) to reduce health disparities in minority, rural residents, and other underserved populations with type 2 diabetes in Central Texas. We hypothesise that: 1) Racial/ethnic minority patients with T2DM will be found to experience disparities in diabetes self-management treatment protocols and clinical outcomes, which persist even when controlling for age, gender, obesity, and insurance status; 2) Patients with T2DM who reside in more rural areas will be found to experience disparities in diabetes self-management treatment protocols and clinical outcomes as compared to more urban counterparts, controlling for age, gender, race/ethnicity, obesity, and insurance status; 3) The introduction of CSDMP and HIT protocols will improve diabetes-related self management behaviors, reduce HBA1c values, and increase quality of life in persons with T2DM as compared to controls. A combined intervention approach will result in the greatest reductions; 4) Health improvements following the introduction of CDSMP, HIT or CDSMP/HIT protocols in persons with T2DM compared to controls will be more marked in racial/ethnic minority patients and those patients residing in rural areas; 5) The introduction of self-management interventions will be cost-effective in reducing HbA1c values over time, and associated health care utilization including overall reduction in ER and acute care hospital admissions; 6) Although there is little prior research in this area to guide specific hypotheses, we hypothesize that, overall, there will be no significant cost-effective differential in CDSMP as compared to HIT approaches, although the cost-effective ratio may be stronger in particular subpopulations. The combined approach will have higher costs, but is also anticipated to have a higher cost-benefit ratio for minority populations; 7) The majority of clinicians will be willing to let their patients enroll in the study and will reinforce intervention protocols; and 8) These interventions can be embedded into existing health care structures. At the end of the study, Scott and White will institutionalize cost-effective treatment protocols.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with T2DM, including those who require insulin therapy, aged >18 years (eliminates the need to obtain assent for minors who are also dependent on their parents).
  • Last measured HbA1c value of > 7.5% (this study hopes to show an improvement in the control of patient's diabetes, and not focused on patients who already show evidence of good disease control).
  • Willingness and ability to attend one initial research visit and semi-annual routine follow-up visits over a 24-month period. The follow-up visits include height, weight, and blood pressure measurement and a survey. Surveys may be conducted by phone interview or mail when a follow-up visit can not be scheduled.
  • Ability to read, write, and speak English at least at a grade 8 level so as to be able to engage in self-monitoring and use the commercial diabetes management software program (Diabetes Pilot), which is available only in English. For those with lower-literacy, assistance in filling out forms and understanding required intervention protocols will be provided, and use of a "buddy" will be recommended.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not willing to sign an informed consent or be randomized to any of the four treatment/control groups, (we want to minimize any upfront treatment biases, while adhering to human subject protocols).
  • Currently, documented severe alcoholism or drug abuse that is < 6 months ago (concerns that this problem is likely to significantly affect their ability and likelihood to comply with the study requirements over the course of the 24 months).
  • Female patients who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant within 12 months (in pregnancy, type 2 diabetes is managed in a completely different manner than in non-pregnant patients).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01221090). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search