Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=78 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Real Time 3-Dimensional Echocardiography for Left Ventricular Lead Site Selection to Reduce Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-Responder Rates

Heart Failure

Enrolled (actual)
78
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Responder Rate — 67; 60 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
3D echo-guided LV lead placement (Procedure)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Primary completion
Jun 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Responder Rate
67; 60

Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) responder rate can be improved by 3-dimensional (3D) echo-guided left ventricular (LV) lead placement compared to traditional LV lead placement.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients will be implanted with an FDA approved St. Jude Medical CRT-D device (i.e. PROMOTE® or newer devices with similar functionality)
  • Patients will have an approved indication per American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines for implantation of a CRT-D
  • Patients will receive a new implant or an upgrade from an existing pacemaker or Implantable Cardiovertor Defibrillator with no prior Left Ventricular lead placement
  • Patients must be in sinus rhythm at the time of enrollment visit and baseline measurements

Exclusion Criteria

  • Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation
  • Heart transplantation
  • Recent myocardial infarction (< 90 days)
  • Contra-indication to contrast agent
  • Are less than 18 years of age
  • Are pregnant
  • Are currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm
  • Have a life expectancy of less than 6 months
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01278030). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search