Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=36 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Uresta Continence Pessary

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Enrolled (actual)
36
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: A 50% Reduction in Pad Test Weight — 12; 4 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Uresta pessary (Device); Silastic ring (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
Primary completion
Dec 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
A 50% Reduction in Pad Test Weight
12; 4

Summary

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is defined as the involuntary loss of urine with an increase in abdominal pressure, caused either by a loss of support under the bladder neck, or intrinsic urethral sphincter deficiency. It is a common problem in women that can significantly impact quality of life, with up to 30% developing SUI at some point in their lifetime. The most commonly utilized treatments for SUI include either pelvic floor (Kegel) exercises, or surgery. Many women find Kegel exercises unsatisfactory, but are reluctant to undergo a surgical procedure. Also, women who are poor candidates for surgery have limited options if Kegel exercises are unsuccessful. Over the years, there have been numerous attempts to develop effective non-surgical alternatives for treating SUI, but the results have been variable and the available data on efficacy limited. A new intravaginal incontinence pessary (Uresta) has been developed for treating stress incontinence, and is currently available in Canada via a medical distributor. The self-positioning device is initially fitted by a healthcare provider, but then can subsequently placed by the patient as needed. Uresta is designed to be easily inserted into the vagina and spontaneously fall into position, providing support beneath the urethra. A single, uncontrolled study of 21 women showed that Uresta significantly reduces urinary incontinence measures, with no reported complications. Using questionnaires, a 47% reduction in self-reported SUI symptoms was demonstrated. Pad weight following a pad test, an objective assessment of urine loss, showed a 50% reduction in leakage. This trial is intended to be a short-term assessment of the efficacy of the Uresta device, using a placebo arm in order to remove any of the possible sources of patient biases. The placebo ("sham") group will be obtained by placing a flexible silastic ring (inactivated Estring) high in the vagina where it will not alter urethral forces. The aim is to unequivocally determine whether the Uresta device provides the necessary urethral support to stop urine leakage from stress incontinence. The hypothesis is that the Uresta device will significantly reduce urinary losses from baseline, shown as a significant reduction pad weight following a pad test with the device in place.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Urodynamic diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence

Exclusion Criteria

  • Urodynamic diagnosis of mixed incontinence
  • Bladder capacity less than 300mls
  • Post-void residual over 100mls
  • Pelvic organ prolapse greater than POP-Q stage 2
  • Hematuria
  • Undiagnosed vaginal bleeding
  • Current pregnancy
  • Previous incontinence or prolapse surgery
  • Failed use of an incontinence pessary
  • Physically unable to perform the activities included in the pad test
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01284244). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search