Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=195 Randomized Supportive Care

Leadless Electrocardiogram (ECG) Evaluation Study

Heart Failure

Enrolled (actual)
195
Serious AEs
18.0%
Results posted
Apr 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Proportion of Patients With LECG Performing Clinically Equivalent to PECG During Standard Pacemaker Follow-up Procedure. — 0.99; 0.98; 0.98; 0.96 proportion

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
LECG first (Other); Programmer ECG first (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Primary completion
Dec 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Proportion of Patients With LECG Performing Clinically Equivalent to PECG During Standard Pacemaker Follow-up Procedure.
0.99; 0.98; 0.98; 0.96
SECONDARY
Evaluation of the Possibility to Determine Ventricle Capture by an Independent Reviewer.
0.51
SECONDARY
Evaluation of the Stability of LECG Performance Over Time.
SECONDARY
Quality of LECG in New Devices Versus Device Replacements.
SECONDARY
Effect of Posture Changes and Artifact-inducing Maneuvers on the LECG Quality.
SECONDARY
Evaluation of Factors Such as Device Rotation, Device Fixation, Device Side Facing the Skin, Position of Lead Loops in the Pocket, Use of Antiseptic Solution, Skin Type, Body Mass Index on the Quality of Leadless ECG.

Summary

The leadless electrocardiogram (LECG) is a new technology incorporated into the Consulta CRT-P to obtain an ECG signal from the Consulta CRT-P similar to a surface ECG obtained from the device programmer (PECG) or an external ECG machine. The purpose of the study is to obtain more data on leadless ECG to determine whether LECG during standard CRT follow-up can indeed adequately replace surface ECG and to evaluate if it can be used during remote follow-up evaluations.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patient with a CRT-P indication and
  • patient who has signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

  • patient younger than 18 years and/or
  • unable to complete the 1-Month Follow-up visit and/or
  • legally incompetent or illiterate and therefore unable to provide an informed consent
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01297283). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search