Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=512 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300mg in Chinese Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)

Hepatitis B

Enrolled (actual)
512
Serious AEs
6.3%
Results posted
Aug 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) <400 Copies/Milliliter (mL) at Week 48 — 79; 18; 149; 109 Participants — p=<0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets (Drug); Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Primary completion
Oct 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) <400 Copies/Milliliter (mL) at Week 48
79; 18; 149; 109 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Participants With HBV DNA <400 Copies/mL at Weeks 96, 144, 192, and 240
95; 92; 144; 143; 97; 95
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline of Log 10 Copies/mL HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240
-6.4; -4.4; -4.9; -4.3; -6.5; -6.5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240 in Participants Who Had Abnormal ALT at Baseline
88; 83; 120; 116; 93; 88
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Histological Improvement at Weeks 48 and 240 Who Had a Baseline Knodell Necroinflammatory Score (KNS) >=2.
31; 39; 32; 34; 5; 2
SECONDARY
Number of HBeAg-positive Participants Achieving HBeAg Loss and HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240.
15; 4; 14; 4; 18; 10
SECONDARY
Number of HBeAg-positive Participants Achieving Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss and HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of HBeAg-negative Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss and HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Achieving Durable HBsAg Loss From Weeks 24 to Week 48
0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Achieving Durable HBsAg Loss From Weeks 96 to Week 240
1; 0; 0; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240
0; 4; 0; 2; 0; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE)
140; 121; 12; 20
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Treatment-emergent (TE) Laboratory Abnormalities (LAs)
2; 0; 2; 3; 19; 14
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities for Serum Creatinine and Serum Phosphorus
0; 1; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants in the Indicated Category for Renal Laboratory Abnormalities
1; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0

Summary

This is a multi-centre, double blind, double dummy, randomised, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TDF 300mg QD versus ADV 10mg QD in Chinese subjects with CHB. This study is designed to demonstrate the superiority of TDF 300mg QD over ADV 10mg QD in treating Chinese subjects with CHB (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg] positive subjects and HBeAg negative subjects). It will also provide long-term efficacy and safety data (up to 240 weeks) for TDF 300 mg administered once daily.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • HBeAg positive/negative CHB with blood HBVDNA≥10^5 copies/mL and elevated ALT
  • Nucleoside and nucleotide naïve CHB subjects. Previous lamivudine treatment is allowed in less than 10% of the total study population

Exclusion Criteria

  • subjects with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) potential or decompensated liver disease
  • subjects with acute liver disease due to other causes
  • subjects with medication history of immunosuppressive therapy, immunomodulatory therapy, systemic cytotoxic agents, chronic antiviral agents including Chinese herbal medicines known to have activity against HBV (e.g., lamivudine, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg)) within the previous 6 months prior to randomisation into this study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01300234). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search