Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=60 Randomized Treatment

Changes in Cerebral Function in Treatment Naive HIV-1 Infected Subjects Commencing Either Boosted Atazanavir With Truvada or Boosted Darunavir With Maraviroc and Kivexa

HIV · Impaired Cognition

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Cognitive Function, Global Cognitive Score (Z-score) — 0.15; 0.19; 0.16; 0.25 z score — p=0.68

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
standard care (Drug); novel treatment (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Imperial College London
Primary completion
Oct 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Cognitive Function, Global Cognitive Score (Z-score)
0.15; 0.19; 0.16; 0.25 0.68
SECONDARY
Brain Function, Absolute Change Over 48 Weeks of N-acetyl Aspartate/Creatinine Ratio
0.071; -0.097 0.0009 sig

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different combination anti-HIV therapies over 48 weeks and to assess if differences in improvement in the function of the brain are observed over this period. The study will compare anti-HIV therapy combinations which are currently in use. The patients will not have had any previous treatment for their HIV infection.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • HIV-1 infected males or females
  • signed informed consent
  • no previous antiretroviral treatment since HIV diagnosis
  • screening CD4+ lymphocyte count grade 2 (with the exception of cholesterol and triglycerides)
  • current history of major depression or psychosis
  • recent head injury (past three months)
  • current alcohol abuse or drug dependence
  • active opportunistic infection or significant co-morbidities
  • patients who are receiving other concomitant medication which are not permitted, as listed in appendix 2
  • female patients of child-bearing potential who:
  • have a positive serum pregnancy test at screening or during the study
  • are breast feeding
  • are planning to become pregnant
  • all participants unwilling to use a barrier method of contraception
  • patients who in the opinion of the investigator are not candidates for inclusion in the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01367236). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search