Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=163 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Safety and Effectiveness of a Non-invasive Neuromodulation Device on Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Overactive Bladder

Overactive Bladder

Enrolled (actual)
163
Serious AEs
0.4%
Results posted
Sep 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Evaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups — 31; 38; 16; 19 Number of responders — p=0.3636

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
(VERV™ System) (Device); Sham version of (VERV™ System) (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Ethicon Endo-Surgery
Primary completion
Jan 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Evaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups
31; 38; 16; 19 0.3636
PRIMARY
Evaluate the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups
-3.7; -1.7; -1.2; -1.0 0.2191
SECONDARY
Measure Change in the Median of the Mean Urinary Frequency
-1.0; -1.3; -1.0; -2.8 0.2893
SECONDARY
Measure Median Change in Mean Volume Per Void
1.0; 8.8 0.3387
SECONDARY
Measure Decrease in the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency Episodes
-1.7; -1.7 0.6557
SECONDARY
Measure Improvement in the Median of the Mean OAB-Symptom Composite Score
-5.8; -8.0 0.4354
SECONDARY
Change in Median Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of OAB-q From Baseline (Screening) to Week 12
8.8; 9.2; 19.2; 24.0 0.9918
SECONDARY
Change in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) From Baseline (Screening Period) to Week 12 as Defined as an Improvement in Severity.
53.7; 44.2; 60.0; 64.3 0.4147
SECONDARY
Assessment of Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS)
55.4; 42.4 0.2032
SECONDARY
Assessment of Improvement as Measure by Overactive Bladder Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SAT)
65.3; 57.6 0.4151
SECONDARY
Change Clinical Global Impressions at 12 Weeks
23.2; 24.2; 36.0; 46.5 0.9814

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change from baseline between the active and sham treatment groups in the treatment of urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Males and Females, at least 18 years of age
  • Failure on primary OAB treatment, such as behavior modification or fluid/diet management, AND at least one (1) anti-cholinergic drug (unless patient was contra-indicated for anti-cholinergic use)
  • Symptoms of overactive bladder for at least 6 months
  • An average of one (1) or more urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes per 24-hours, over a 3-day period, confirmed by the 3-day baseline voiding diary, with a maximum of 12 urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes per 24-hours
  • Dexterity and ability to place and operate the device
  • Females of child-bearing capability agrees to use a reliable form of birth control for the duration of the trial
  • An average of eight (8) or more voids per 24-hours, over a 3-day period, confirmed by the 3-day baseline voiding diary
  • Willing and capable of understanding and complying with all requirements of the protocol, including proper completion of the baseline voiding diary
  • Signed and dated the IRB-approved Informed Consent document.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Dysfunctional voiding symptoms unrelated to OAB, such as clinically significant bladder outlet obstruction, and urinary retention (pvr > 100 cc)
  • Morbidly obese, defined as having Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2
  • Stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence
  • Neurological disease affecting urinary bladder function, including but not limited to Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, stroke, spinal cord injury and uncontrolled epilepsy.
  • Pelvic surgery (such as sub-urethral sling, pelvic floor repair) within the past 6 months
  • Intravesical or urethral sphincter Botulinum Toxin Type A injections within the past 12 months
  • Any neuromodulation therapy for overactive bladder within the past 3 months
  • Failure to respond to previous neuromodulation therapy for overactive bladder
  • Leading edge of any vaginal prolapse is beyond hymenel ring.
  • Prior peri-urethral or transurethral bulking agent injections for bladder problems within the past 12 months.
  • Any skin conditions affecting treatment or assessment of the treatment sites
  • History of lower back surgery or injury that could impact placement of the patch, or where underlying scar tissue or nerve damage may impact treatment.
  • Presence of an implanted electro-medical device (e.g. pacemaker, defibrillator, InterStim®, etc.), or any metallic implant in the lower back.
  • Pregnant, nursing, suspected to be pregnant (by urine pregnancy method), or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study.
  • Known latex allergies, or allergies or hypersensitivity to patch materials that will be in contact with the body (e.g., hydrogel, acrylic-based adhesive, polyurethane).
  • Uncontrolled diabetes and/or diabetes with peripheral neuropathy.
  • Current Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) or history of recurrent UTIs (>3 UTIs in the past year).
  • History of lower tract genitourinary malignancies within the last 6 months or any previous pelvic radiation.
  • Any clinically significant systemic disease or condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the patient unsuitable for the study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01369485). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search