Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 1 N=12 Randomized Double-blind

Taste Assessment Study of 2 Atazanavir Powder Formulations in Healthy Subjects

HIV

Enrolled (actual)
12
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Median Scores on a Subjective Sweet Intensity Scale for Current and New Powder for Oral Use (POU) Formulations of Atazanavir — 1.5; 1.5; 1.0 Units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Interventions
Atazanavir (current formulation) (Drug); Atazanavir, powder for oral use 1 (POU1) (Drug); Atazanavir (POU2) (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Primary completion
Sep 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Median Scores on a Subjective Sweet Intensity Scale for Current and New Powder for Oral Use (POU) Formulations of Atazanavir
1.5; 1.5; 1.0
PRIMARY
Mean Scores on a Subjective Sweet Intensity Scale for Current and New Powder for Oral Use (POU) Formulations of Atazanavir
1.3; 1.4; 1.0
SECONDARY
Median Palatability Score for Current and New Powder for Oral Use Formulations of Atazanavir
3; 3; 2
SECONDARY
Mean Palatability Score for Current and New Powder for Oral Use (POU) Formulations of Atazanavir
3.0; 2.8; 2.3
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Marked Abnormalities in Results of Clinical Laboratory Tests
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings on Electrocardiograms
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Died and With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Changes in Vital Signs

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the sweetness of 2 new atazanavir powder for oral use (POU) formulations to the current atazanavir POU in healthy participants and to select 1 atazanavir POU that has the sweetness most similar to the current atazanavir POU.

Eligibility Criteria

Key inclusion criteria

  • Healthy men and women, ages 18 to 49, inclusive
  • Nonsmokers
  • Women not pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Participants who could match solutions of the same sweetness and provide consistent sweetness scores during the taste screening

Key exclusion criteria

  • Any significant acute or chronic medical illness
  • Any acute or chronic condition that may have altered taste sensory perception
  • Any major surgery or trauma within 4 weeks of Day 1
  • Blood transfusion within 4 weeks of study participation
  • Recent (within 6 months of Day 1) drug or alcohol abuse as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th edition, Diagnostic Criteria for Drug and Alcohol Abuse
  • Positive urine drug screen
  • Positive urine screen for cotinine
  • Positive hepatitis C antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen, or human immunodeficiency virus antibodies
  • Clinically significant elevations in results of liver function tests above normal range
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01404572). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search