N/A
N=55
Clinical Evaluation of MDT-2111 in Subjects With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01437098 ↗Enrolled (actual)
55
Serious AEs
89.1%
Results posted
Jun 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Composite Success of Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class and a Performance Goal for Effective Orifice Area (EOA). — 93.6; 91.7 percentage of participants — p=<0.001
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- MDT-2111 CoreValve for TAVI (Device)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiovascular
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Composite Success of Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class and a Performance Goal for Effective Orifice Area (EOA). |
93.6; 91.7 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY NYHA Classification Over Time |
57.7; 9.6; 0; 0; 32.7 | — |
| SECONDARY NYHA Classification Over Time |
57.7; 9.6; 0; 0; 32.7 | — |
| SECONDARY NYHA Classification Over Time |
57.7; 9.6; 0; 0; 32.7 | — |
| SECONDARY NYHA Classification Over Time |
57.7; 9.6; 0; 0; 32.7 | — |
| SECONDARY NYHA Classification Over Time |
57.7; 9.6; 0; 0; 32.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) |
57.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) |
57.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) |
57.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) |
57.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) |
57.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Device Success as Defined in the Description. |
90.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Procedural Success, Defined as Device Success and Absence of In-hospital MACCE. |
81.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient |
8.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance- Mean Gradient |
8.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient |
8.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient |
8.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient |
8.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance- Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
1.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance- Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
1.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance- Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
1.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance- Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
1.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance- Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
1.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
61.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
61.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
61.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
61.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
61.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Valve Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR) |
25.7; 31.4; 37.1; 5.7; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Valve Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR) |
25.7; 31.4; 37.1; 5.7; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Valve Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR) |
25.7; 31.4; 37.1; 5.7; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Valve Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR) |
25.7; 31.4; 37.1; 5.7; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Valve Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR) |
25.7; 31.4; 37.1; 5.7; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Repeat Hospitalization |
35.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Repeat Hospitalization |
35.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Repeat Hospitalization |
35.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Repeat Hospitalization |
35.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Repeat Hospitalization |
35.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Valve-related Deaths |
94.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Valve-related Deaths |
94.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Valve-Related Deaths |
94.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Valve-related Deaths |
94.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Valve-related Deaths |
94.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline) (Q of L) |
4.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline) (Q of L) |
4.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline) (Q of L) |
4.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline) (Q of L) |
4.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline) (Q of L) |
4.8 | — |
Summary
The primary objective of the present trial is to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of the MDT-2111 in the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects deemed difficult for surgical operation.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Subject must have co-morbidities such that one cardiologist and one cardiac surgeons agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement.
- Subject has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with:
mean gradient > 40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s by either resting or dobutamine stress echocardiogram, or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization (either resting or dobutamine stress), AND an initial aortic valve area of ≤ 0.8 cm² (or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.5 cm²/m²) by resting echocardiogram.
- Subject is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Class Class III or greater. If screening committee agrees the eligibility of a patient with class II , based on medical factors, he/she can be enrolled.
- Subject has been informed of the nature of the trial and has signed an Informed Consent Form.
- Subject agrees to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and to return to the same investigational site where the procedure was performed.
Exclusion Criteria
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 30 days prior to the intended treatment.
- Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior to the procedure.
- Blood dyscrasias as defined:
- Leukopenia (WBC count 27 mm per the screening diagnostic imaging.
- Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position.
- Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation).
- Mitral regurgitation (moderate to severe) or severe tricuspid regurgitation.
- Moderate to severe mitral stenosis.
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
- Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
- Severe basal septal hypertrophy with an outflow gradient.
- Ascending aorta diameter > 43 mm (in case of the aortic annulus is 23-27 mm) unless the aortic annulus is 20-23 mm in which case the ascending aorta diameter > 40 mm.
- Congenital bicuspid or unicuspid valve verified by echocardiography.
- For patients with native coronary artery dependent circulation:
- Sinus of valsalva width < 29 mm unless the aortic annulus is 20-23 mm, in which case the sinus of valsalva width < 27 mm, OR
- Height of the left or right coronary sinus of valsalva (to the tubular aorta) < 15mm.
- Femoral or iliac artery of the first choice corresponding to any one of the followings:
- Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70°.
- Vessel diameter of femoral or iliac artery is less than 6 mm.
- Aorta has severe calcification, excess tortuosity or severe atherosclerosis.
- Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
- Subclavian artery of the second choice corresponding to any one of the followings:
- Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70° (in the case of left subclavian artery) and 30° (in the case of right subclavian artery).
- Vessel diameter of subclavian artery is less than 6 mm.
- Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
- Direct Aortic Artery as third line choice of access. Patients are excluded from Direct Aortic access if:
- Access site is less than 6 cm from the aortic valve basal plane
- Access site has calcification or porcelain aorta
- Access site and delivery trajectory contain RIMA or patent RIMA graft
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01437098). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.