Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=1,074 Randomized Prevention

More Options Available With a Quadripolar LV Lead pRovidE In-clinic Solutions to CRT Challenges

Postoperative Cardiac Complication · Heart Failure · Left Ventricular Cardiac Dysfunction · Inappropriate Phrenic Nerve Stimulation · Perioperative/Postoperative Complications

Enrolled (actual)
1,074
Serious AEs
50.6%
Results posted
Oct 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Lead Performance — 83; 74.4 % of patients with freedom from event

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
BiP Group (Procedure); Quad Group (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Primary completion
May 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Lead Performance
83; 74.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Responders
62.0; 56.0
SECONDARY
Implant Duration
100.4; 101.1

Summary

This investigation is designed with the hypothesis that using a quadripolar left ventricular lead results in less interventions when dealing with high pacing thresholds and Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PNS), both at implant and during follow-up, compared to standard bipolar left ventricular leads.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients are indicated for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Defibrillation backup device (CRT-D) implantation, as per current international certified guidelines
  • Patients age is 18 years or greater
  • Patients must indicate their understanding of the study and willingness to participate by signing the appropriate informed consent form
  • Patients must be willing and able to comply with all study requirements

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a life expectancy <12 months.
  • Patients who are or may potentially be pregnant.
  • Patient has suffered any of the following in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment:
  • Myocardial Infarction (MI)
  • Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
  • Unstable Angina Pectoris
  • Patient has primary valvular disease which has not been corrected
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01510652). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search