Phase 3
Completed N=239
Safety and Efficacy of Etoricoxib 30 mg Versus Celecoxib 200 mg in Korean Participants With Osteoarthritis
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01554163 ↗Enrolled (actual)
239
Serious AEs
0.4%
Results posted
Dec 2013
Primary outcomePrimary: Time-Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale — -21.40; -19.76 Score on a Scale — p=0.390
Summary
The main purpose of this study is to establish that etoricoxib 30 mg is safe and not inferior to celecoxib 200 mg in the treatment of the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis in Korean patients. Given that the efficacy of etoricoxib vs. placebo in the treatment of osteoarthritis has been established, and that prescription drugs, such as celecoxib, are available for the treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis in Korea, it would be inappropriate to subject patients with a flare of osteoarthritic pain to the placebo treatment for 12 weeks, and thus the study is designed as an active-comparator study.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Time-Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale |
-21.40; -19.76 | 0.390 |
| SECONDARY Time-Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Physical Function Subscale |
-17.78; -16.46 | 0.464 |
| SECONDARY Time-Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in the Participant Global Assessment of Disease Status |
-24.71; -23.61 | 0.624 |
| SECONDARY Time-Weighted Mean Response in the Participant Global Assessment of Response to Therapy |
1.48; 1.56 | 0.369 |
| SECONDARY Time-Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in the Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Status |
-1.71; -1.62 | 0.294 |
| SECONDARY Time-Weighted Mean Change From Baseline in the WOMAC Stiffness Subscale |
-18.41; -17.55 | 0.679 |
| SECONDARY Time-Weighted Mean Response on the Investigator Global Assessment of Response to Therapy |
1.39; 1.49 | 0.314 |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patient is at least 40 years of age
- Clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee for greater than 6 months based on clinical and radiographic criteria
- Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to study enrollment and must agree to remain abstinent, and use barrier, intramuscular, or implanted contraceptives from Visit 1 until 28 days after the last dose of study medication.
- Patient is of American Rheumatism Association (ARA) functional Class I, II, or III
- Patient is willing to limit alcohol intake to 2 or less drinks per day during study and the follow-up period
- Patient is willing to avoid unaccustomed physical activity for the duration of the study and follow-up period
- With the exception of osteoarthritis, the patient is judged to be in good general health based on medical history, physical exam, and routine laboratory tests
- Patient is able to read, understand and complete study questionnaires, including questions requiring a visual analog scale (VAS) response
- Patient provides written informed consent for the trial
- For prior non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users only, the patient has a history of positive therapeutic benefit with NSAIDs and has taken an NSAID prior to study enrollment and at a therapeutic dose level prior to study enrollment (Visit 1)
- For prior NSAID users only, the patient assessment of Pain Walking on a Flat Surface (WOMAC Section A, Question1) at Visit 1 (prestudy) is less than 80 mm (100 mm VAS)
- For prior NSAID users only, prior to randomization, and following discontinuation of NSAIDs during the washout period specified patients must satisfy the following 3 flare criteria: Minimum of 40 mm on patient reported Pain Walking on a Flat Surface (WOMAC Section A, Question 1); Increase of 15 mm on patient reported Pain Walking on a Flat Surface (WOMAC Section A, Question 1) compared to prestudy baseline recorded at Visit 1; and A worsening in Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Status of at least 1 category on a 5 category scale compared to Visit 1 recording
- For prior acetaminophen/paracetamol users only, patient has taken acetaminophen/paracetamol on a regular basis prior to study enrollment (Visit 1) and does not use NSAIDs for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee
- For prior acetominophen/paracetamol users only, at both Visits 1 and 2, patients must satisfy all of the following 3 criteria: Minimum of 40 mm on patient reported Pain Walking on a Flat Surface (WOMAC Section A, Question 1); Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Status as fair, poor, or very poor; and Minimum of 40 mm on Patient Global Assessment of Disease Status (100 mm
VAS)
Exclusion Criteria
- Patient has a concurrent medical/arthritic disease that could confound or interfere with evaluation of efficacy
- Patient is legally incompetent (e.g., a minor or mentally incapacitated), or has active psychosis, or significant emotional problems at the time of the study which in the view of the investigator are sufficient to interfere with the conduct of the study
- Patient has a history of gastric or biliary surgery (including gastric bypass surgery), or small intestine surgery that causes clinical malabsorption
- Patient is allergic to, or has a history of a significant clinical or laboratory adverse experience associated with etoricoxib or celecoxib or any of their constituents
- Patient is allergic to acetaminophen/paracetamol, or has hypersensitivity (e.g., bronchoconstriction in association with nasal polyps) to aspirin or NSAIDs
- Patient has an estimated glomerular filtration rate is less than or equal to 30 ml/min
- Patient has Class II-IV congestive heart failure
- Patient has established ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral vascular disease
- Patient has uncontrolled hypertension with an diastolic exclusionary limit of > 90 mm Hg and a systolic exclusionary limit of > 140 mm Hg
- Patient has
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01554163). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.