Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=7,180 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Efficacy and Safety of Romosozumab Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Enrolled (actual)
7,180
Serious AEs
14.8%
Results posted
Nov 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 12 — 1.8; 0.5 percentage of participants — p=< 0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Romosozumab (Drug); Placebo (Drug); Denosumab (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 55+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Amgen
Primary completion
Dec 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 12
1.8; 0.5 < 0.001 sig
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With New Vertebral Fracture Through Month 24
2.5; 0.6 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Fracture Through Month 12
2.5; 1.6 0.008 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 12
2.1; 1.6 0.096
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 24
3.6; 2.7 0.057
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Fracture Through Month 24
4.1; 2.8 0.096
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Major Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 12
1.5; 1.0 0.096
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Major Nonvertebral Fracture Through Month 24
2.8; 1.9 0.096
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a New or Worsening Vertebral Fracture Through Month 12
1.8; 0.5 0.096
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a New or Worsening Vertebral Fracture Through Month 24
2.5; 0.7 0.096
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Hip Fracture Through Month 12
0.4; 0.2 0.18
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Hip Fracture Through Month 24
0.6; 0.3 0.12
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Major Osteoporotic Fracture Through Month 12
1.8; 1.1 0.012 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Major Osteoporotic Fracture Through Month 24
3.1; 1.9 0.002 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Multiple New or Worsening Vertebral Fractures Through Month 12
0.3; 0.03 0.011 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Multiple New or Worsening Vertebral Fractures Through Month 24
0.5; 0.03 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 12
0.4; 13.1 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline In Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine at Month 24
5.5; 16.6 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Total Hip at Month 12
0.3; 6.0 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Total Hip at Month 24
3.2; 8.5 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femoral Neck at Month 12
0.3; 5.5 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density of the Femoral Neck at Month 24
2.3; 7.3 < 0.001 sig

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with romosozumab is effective in preventing fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, defined as low bone mineral density (BMD T-score at the total hip or femoral neck of ≤ -2.50)

Exclusion Criteria

  • BMD T-score of ≤ -3.50 at the total hip or femoral neck
  • History of hip fracture
  • Any severe or more than 2 moderate vertebral fractures, as assessed by the central imaging based on lateral spine x-rays
  • Use of agents affecting bone metabolism
  • History of metabolic or bone disease (except osteoporosis)
  • Vitamin D insufficiency (vitamin D repletion and rescreening is permitted)
  • Current hyper- or hypocalcemia
  • Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypothyroidism
  • Current, uncontrolled hyper- or hypoparathyroidism
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01575834). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search