Phase 4
N=24
Does Ultrasound Improve Procedural Time in the Lateral Popliteal Approach to the Sciatic Nerve in Obese Patients
Postoperative Pain
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01579747 ↗Enrolled (actual)
24
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Procedural Time — 577; 206 seconds
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Interventions
- Ultrasound (Procedure); Nerve stimulation (Procedure)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of New Mexico
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Procedural Time |
577; 206 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Redirections |
20; 3.5 | <0.05 sig |
Summary
Ultrasound have been shown to improve the time needed to locate and block nerves in the non obese population. However, its utility is still unknown in the obese population. Ultrasound is known to produce poorer quality images in the obese population. This study aims to find out if it is a better tool for nerve localization compared to the traditional nerve stimulation technique.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- ASA 1-3
- Age 18 and above
- BMI >30
- Operations requiring lateral popliteal approach to the sciatic nerve block
Exclusion Criteria
- Diabetes
- Injection site deformities
- infection at the injection site
- existing peripheral neuropathy
- allergy to LA agents
- Dementia or communication problems
- Inability to understand or discern temperature difference
- Any other contraindication to lower limb peripheral nerve block
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01579747). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.