Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=80 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

The Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated With the Use of Non-pharmacological in Labor

Pain

Enrolled (actual)
80
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants Who Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Childbirth — 37; 35 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Use of non-pharmacological (Other); Other: Routine care (Other)
Age
Pediatric, Adult · 15+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Primary completion
Jan 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Who Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Childbirth
37; 35
PRIMARY
The Moment in Centimeters That Women Requested Analgesia During the Active Phase of Childbirth, Analyzed by Cevical Dilation.
19; 1; 16; 8; 2; 26
PRIMARY
Average Duration of the Expulsive Period When Compared to Groups
26; 18.5
PRIMARY
Types of Dystocia (Functional, Secondary Stop of Dilation and Fetal Offspring) Between Groups
24; 17; 6; 3; 4; 6
PRIMARY
Admission Numbers to a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Between Groups.
34; 26
PRIMARY
Number of Newborns With Apgar Scores of 1 and 5 Minutes, Less Than or Greater Than 7.
31; 30; 40; 40
PRIMARY
Frequency of Suspected Fetal Distress, Between Groups
2; 1
SECONDARY
Moment of Rupture of the Chorioamniorex Between the Groups.
7; 8
SECONDARY
Incidence in the Type of Delivery (Cesarean Section, Normal Delivery With Laceration, Episiotomy, Forceps and Normal Delivery).
10; 6; 3; 8; 4; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Puerperal Women Who Present Hemorrhage in the Immediate Puerperium With Hemodynamic Repercussions Between Groups.
2; 0
SECONDARY
The Number of Puerperal Infections Between Groups.
0; 0

Summary

Although there are studies that investigated the use of non-pharmacological pain relief and correction of dystocia during labor, there are few randomized controlled trials, especially related to combined protocols that use such resources. The use of combined protocols could potentiate the effects of resource use alone, evidencing the need for more studies related to the topic, as well as the effects of these methods on maternal and perinatal outcomes. In order to verify the effect of these methods in various stages of labor, childbirth and immediately becomes necessary to conduct a randomized controlled trial well-designed and adequate sample size that can make the future systematic reviews that can definitely conclude about the potential effectiveness of protocols that use combined resources to non-pharmacological pain relief in labor. Aim of our study is to evaluate the effects of a protocol of non-pharmacological resources on pain of pregnant women in the active phase of cervical dilatation and compared with controls.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Agreement of the patient to participate in the study after reading and signing the consent form;
  • primigravida;
  • Pregnancy unique;
  • Gestational age> 37 weeks;
  • fetal cephalic presentation;
  • chorioamniotic intact membranes;
  • spontaneous labor;
  • Admission to the beginning of the active phase of dilatation (4 cm cervical dilatation);
  • Dynamics between 2 and 4 uterine contractions in ten minutes;
  • Lack of maternal and fetal pathologies;
  • literate;
  • Absence of cognitive problems.

Exclusion Criteria

Intolerance to non-pharmacological application of resources;

  • Increased pain by the woman that prevents the completion of the intervention;
  • Want to stop the intervention;
  • Suspected acute suffering;
  • Indication of cesarean section.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01601860). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search