N/A
N=20
Clinical Evaluation of MDT-2111 in Subjects With Small Aortic Annuli and Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
Aortic Valve Stenosis
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01634269 ↗Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
80.0%
Results posted
Dec 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Composite Score of Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class and Effective Orifice Area (EOA). — 75.0; 87.5 percentage of participants analyzed — p=0.002
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- MDT-2111 TAVI 23 mm (Device)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiovascular
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Composite Score of Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class and Effective Orifice Area (EOA). |
75.0; 87.5 | 0.002 sig |
| SECONDARY New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time |
47.4; 47.4; 0.0; 0.0; 5.3 | — |
| SECONDARY New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time |
47.4; 47.4; 0.0; 0.0; 5.3 | — |
| SECONDARY New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time |
47.4; 47.4; 0.0; 0.0; 5.3 | — |
| SECONDARY New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time |
47.4; 47.4; 0.0; 0.0; 5.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) |
90.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) |
90.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) |
90.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE) |
90.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Device Success as Defined in the Description. |
65.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Procedural Success, Defined as Device Success and Absence of In-hospital MACCE |
65.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient |
13.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient |
13.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient |
13.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient |
13.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
1.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
1.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
1.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
1.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
67.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
67.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
67.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) |
67.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR) |
11.1; 38.9; 44.4; 5.6; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR) |
11.1; 38.9; 44.4; 5.6; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR) |
11.1; 38.9; 44.4; 5.6; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR) |
11.1; 38.9; 44.4; 5.6; 0.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Repeat Hospitalization |
30.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Repeat Hospitalization |
30.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Repeat Hospitalization |
30.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Repeat Hospitalization |
30.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Valve-related Deaths |
100 | — |
| SECONDARY Valve-related Deaths |
100 | — |
| SECONDARY Valve-related Deaths |
100 | — |
| SECONDARY Valve-related Deaths |
100 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline) |
5.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline) |
5.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline) |
5.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline) |
5.3 | — |
Summary
The primary objective of the present trial is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the MDT-2111 in the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects with small aortic annuli and deemed difficult for surgical operation.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Subject must have co-morbidities such that one cardiologist and one cardiac surgeon agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement.
- Subject has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with:
mean gradient > 40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s by either resting or dobutamine stress echocardiogram, or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization (either resting or dobutamine stress), AND an initial aortic valve area of ≤ 0.8 cm² (or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.5 cm²/m²) by resting echocardiogram.
- Subject is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Class Class III or greater. If screening committee agrees the eligibility of a patient with class II , based on medical factors, he/she can be enrolled.
- Patient has been informed of the nature of the trial and has signed an Informed Consent Form.
- Patient agrees to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and to return to the same investigational site where the procedure was performed.
Exclusion Criteria
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 30 days prior to the intended treatment.
- Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior to the procedure.
- Blood dyscrasias as defined:
- Leukopenia (WBC count 20 mm per the screening diagnostic imaging.
- Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position.
- Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation).
- Mitral regurgitation (moderate to severe) or severe tricuspid regurgitation.
- Moderate to severe mitral stenosis.
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
- Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
- Severe basal septal hypertrophy with an outflow gradient.
- Ascending aorta diameter > 34 mm
- Congenital bicuspid or unicuspid valve verified by echocardiography.
- For patients with native coronary artery dependent circulation:
- Sinus of valsalva width < 25 mm OR
- Height of the left or right coronary sinus of valsalva (to the tubular aorta) < 15mm.
- Femoral or iliac artery of the first choice corresponding to any one of the following:
- Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70°.
- Vessel diameter of femoral or iliac artery is less than 6 mm.
- Aorta has severe calcification, excess tortuosity or severe atherosclerosis.
- Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
- Subclavian artery of the second choice corresponding to any one of the following:
- Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70° (in the case of left subclavian artery) and 30° (in the case of right subclavian artery).
- Vessel diameter of subclavian artery is less than 6 mm.
- Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
- Direct Aortic Artery as third line choice of access. Patients are excluded from Direct Aortic access if:
- Access site is less than 6 cm from the aortic valve basal plane
- Access site has calcification or porcelain aorta
- Access site and delivery trajectory contain RIMA or patent RIMA graft
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01634269). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.