Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=20 Treatment

Clinical Evaluation of MDT-2111 in Subjects With Small Aortic Annuli and Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
80.0%
Results posted
Dec 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Composite Score of Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class and Effective Orifice Area (EOA). — 75.0; 87.5 percentage of participants analyzed — p=0.002

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
MDT-2111 TAVI 23 mm (Device)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Medtronic Cardiovascular
Primary completion
Feb 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Composite Score of Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class and Effective Orifice Area (EOA).
75.0; 87.5 0.002 sig
SECONDARY
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
47.4; 47.4; 0.0; 0.0; 5.3
SECONDARY
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
47.4; 47.4; 0.0; 0.0; 5.3
SECONDARY
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
47.4; 47.4; 0.0; 0.0; 5.3
SECONDARY
New York Heart Classification (NYHA) Over Time
47.4; 47.4; 0.0; 0.0; 5.3
SECONDARY
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)
90.0
SECONDARY
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)
90.0
SECONDARY
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)
90.0
SECONDARY
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Event (MACCE)
90.0
SECONDARY
Device Success as Defined in the Description.
65.0
SECONDARY
Procedural Success, Defined as Device Success and Absence of In-hospital MACCE
65.0
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient
13.7
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient
13.7
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient
13.7
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Mean Gradient
13.7
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
1.3
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
1.3
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
1.3
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
1.3
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
67.9
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
67.9
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
67.9
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
67.9
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
11.1; 38.9; 44.4; 5.6; 0.0
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
11.1; 38.9; 44.4; 5.6; 0.0
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
11.1; 38.9; 44.4; 5.6; 0.0
SECONDARY
Echocardiographic Assessment of Prosthetic Valve Performance - Total Aortic Regurgitation (Transvalvular & Paravalvular) (Total AR)
11.1; 38.9; 44.4; 5.6; 0.0
SECONDARY
Repeat Hospitalization
30.0
SECONDARY
Repeat Hospitalization
30.0
SECONDARY
Repeat Hospitalization
30.0
SECONDARY
Repeat Hospitalization
30.0
SECONDARY
Valve-related Deaths
100
SECONDARY
Valve-related Deaths
100
SECONDARY
Valve-related Deaths
100
SECONDARY
Valve-related Deaths
100
SECONDARY
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
5.3
SECONDARY
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
5.3
SECONDARY
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
5.3
SECONDARY
Quality of Life Assessment Using SF-36 Questionnaire - Physical Component Summary (Paired Change From Baseline)
5.3

Summary

The primary objective of the present trial is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the MDT-2111 in the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects with small aortic annuli and deemed difficult for surgical operation.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject must have co-morbidities such that one cardiologist and one cardiac surgeon agree that medical factors preclude operation, based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement.
  • Subject has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with:

mean gradient > 40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s by either resting or dobutamine stress echocardiogram, or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization (either resting or dobutamine stress), AND an initial aortic valve area of ≤ 0.8 cm² (or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.5 cm²/m²) by resting echocardiogram.

  • Subject is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Class Class III or greater. If screening committee agrees the eligibility of a patient with class II , based on medical factors, he/she can be enrolled.
  • Patient has been informed of the nature of the trial and has signed an Informed Consent Form.
  • Patient agrees to comply with specified follow-up evaluations and to return to the same investigational site where the procedure was performed.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 30 days prior to the intended treatment.
  • Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior to the procedure.
  • Blood dyscrasias as defined:
  • Leukopenia (WBC count 20 mm per the screening diagnostic imaging.
  • Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position.
  • Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation).
  • Mitral regurgitation (moderate to severe) or severe tricuspid regurgitation.
  • Moderate to severe mitral stenosis.
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  • Severe basal septal hypertrophy with an outflow gradient.
  • Ascending aorta diameter > 34 mm
  • Congenital bicuspid or unicuspid valve verified by echocardiography.
  • For patients with native coronary artery dependent circulation:
  • Sinus of valsalva width < 25 mm OR
  • Height of the left or right coronary sinus of valsalva (to the tubular aorta) < 15mm.
  • Femoral or iliac artery of the first choice corresponding to any one of the following:
  • Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70°.
  • Vessel diameter of femoral or iliac artery is less than 6 mm.
  • Aorta has severe calcification, excess tortuosity or severe atherosclerosis.
  • Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
  • Subclavian artery of the second choice corresponding to any one of the following:
  • Angle at aortic root (the angle between aortic valve annulus plane and horizontal plane/vertebra) exceeds 70° (in the case of left subclavian artery) and 30° (in the case of right subclavian artery).
  • Vessel diameter of subclavian artery is less than 6 mm.
  • Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18Fr sheath.
  • Direct Aortic Artery as third line choice of access. Patients are excluded from Direct Aortic access if:
  • Access site is less than 6 cm from the aortic valve basal plane
  • Access site has calcification or porcelain aorta
  • Access site and delivery trajectory contain RIMA or patent RIMA graft
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01634269). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search