Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=60

ADHD Electrophysiological Subtypes and Implications in Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation

ADHD · ADD

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Clinical Assessment (Amen Questionnaire) — 9.85; 3.55; 5.15; 3.54 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Active tDCS (Device)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 8+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Spanish Foundation for Neurometrics Development
Primary completion
Dec 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Clinical Assessment (Amen Questionnaire)
9.85; 3.55; 5.15; 3.54
SECONDARY
Event-related Potentials Amplitude (ERPs)
6.07; 5.40; 4.96; 4.77; 9.22; 7.01
SECONDARY
Event-related Potentials Latency (ERPs)
323.78; 324.44; 321.56; 326.21; 348.67; 354.00
SECONDARY
Reaction Time (Behavior Task)
466.95; 354.68; 444.65; 356.58; 467.04; 352.29
SECONDARY
Number of Omission and Commission Errors of Behavior Task
11.22; 1.07; 12.22; 1.04; 0.83; 0.04

Summary

In the present study the aim is to examine whether transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) generated excitability changes and induce modifications of functional cortical architecture in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) patients. To achieve this, the investigators used an event-related potential (ERP) analysis based on 20 channel EEG recordings in ADHD subjects before and after bipolar tDCS-anode stimulation over F3/F4 or T5/T6 or P4/P3, during resting state and measure clinical scores and visual CPT tasks changes. Time courses and topography of independent component visual ERPs were compared before and after tDCS.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • ADHD diagnosis.
  • Age between 7 and 65 years.
  • Comorbidities were no reason for subject exclusion.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of psychosis.
  • Subjects taking medication, they had refrained from taking methylphenidate during 24 hours before testing.
  • Subjects taking other psychotropics were not included in the study.
  • Subjects which had suffered of a head injury with subsequent loss of consciousness, and subjects suffering from neurological or systemic medical diseases were excluded from the study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01649232). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search