N/A
N=31
Traditional Balance vs Vibrotactile Feedback Training for Vestibular Rehabilitation
Traumatic Brain Injury · Vestibular Deficits
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01672658 ↗Enrolled (actual)
31
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Berg Balance Scale — 45; 44; 48; 47 Units on a continuous scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Sensory Kinetics Balance System (Device); Traditional Vestibular Rehabilitation (Other)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Berg Balance Scale |
45; 44; 48; 47; 50; 47 | — |
| PRIMARY Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) |
15.714; 17.125; 18.929; 21.21; 20.642; 23.36 | — |
| SECONDARY 10 Meter Walk Test |
0.873; 1.067; 0.944; 1.236; 1.021; 1.253 | — |
| SECONDARY Six Minute Walk Test |
1021.6; 1158.2; 1075.4; 1271.1; 1165.6; 1312.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance (mCTSlB) - Eyes Closed |
11.18375; 9.119280952; 15.98062479; 16.99357119; 17.986458; 20.423095 | — |
| SECONDARY Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Organization and Balance (mCTSlB) - Eyes Open |
21.13041667; 21.13333333; 27.039375; 25.715; 27.467271; 26.277143 | — |
| SECONDARY Activities Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) |
60.1396875; 55.53035714; 71.1828125; 60.11178571; 72.445313; 66.151786 | — |
| SECONDARY Dizziness Handicap Inventory |
40.6; 40.5; 37.0; 38.5; 32.6; 26.0 | — |
Summary
The goal of this clinical research study at RIC is to determine the value and benefit of the SK multimodal balance training system through independent clinical evaluations. The functional benefit of the SK Balance system will be measured by any improvements in balance and functional assessments.
This study is primarily funded through Engineering Acoustics as a subcontract for a phase II Small Business Innovation Research by the Department of Defense.
3) Hypotheses & Research Objectives and Purpose:
The specific research questions to be addressed are:
1. How does an 8-week SKBS+VRT training intervention compare to an 8-week standard VRT intervention on balance and functional gait measures in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) participants.
2. How do SKBS measurement tools compare to standard clinical assessments of gait and balance in mTBI patients The purpose of this clinical research study is to compare the value and benefit of the SK multimodal balance training system in combination with traditional vestibular rehabilitation vs. traditional vestibular rehabilitation alone through independent clinical evaluations. The functional benefit of the SK Balance system will be measured by any improvements in clinical measures of balance, functional mobility, and gait assessment.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Mild to moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
- Adults 18 years-75 years old
- Vestibular &/or balance deficit following mild/moderate TBI and confirmed by healthcare professional
- Subjects reporting head injury from exposure to a blast/concussion injury with one or more of the following symptoms: dizziness, vertigo, headache, migraine, oscillopsia, movement induced vertigo.
- Able to sit unaided for two minutes
- Able to stand independently with or without a cane, or with no more than moderate assistance from the physical therapist/researcher.
Exclusion Criteria
- Multiple trauma
- Severe brain injury as defined above
- Pacemakers
- Weight greater than 250 lbs
- Mini Mental Status Exam score of less than 24 and/or Cognitive Log score of less than 25
- A diagnosis of:
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Severe neuromuscular diseases
- Severe Cardiovascular disease
- Associated high-level stroke or spinal cord injury
- Amputees
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01672658). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.