Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Early Phase 1 N=55 Randomized Treatment

Pilot Study on Mindfulness for Tobacco and Alcohol in University Students

Nicotine Dependence · Alcohol Use

Enrolled (actual)
55
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Smoking Abstinence — 6; 1 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Interventions
Mindfulness Training for Smokers (Behavioral); Interactive Learning for Smokers (Behavioral)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Primary completion
Sep 2007

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Smoking Abstinence
6; 1
SECONDARY
Alcohol Use in Study Subjects vs Controls

Summary

A. The study follows a randomized controlled design with approximately 60 smokers with a history of alcohol abuse age 18-29. The study will compare a 7-week mindfulness intervention to a matched 7-week education intervention to evaluate intervention effect on smoking cessation and reduction in alcohol use. The primary hypothesis is that the mindfulness intervention will yield statistically significantly higher smoking abstinence than controls as measured by carbon monoxide breath test and Time Line Follow Back at at the end of treatment (2-weeks post smoking cessation attempt).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age: 18 to 29 years
  • Tobacco use of at least 10 cigarettes per day for at least 6 months
  • Alcohol use of 5 or more binges/month (Binge = 5 or more drinks for males, 4 or more for females)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Baseline (orientation meeting) CO level < 10
  • Self report of pre-existing bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, other delusional disorder
  • Self report of pre-existing diagnosis of personality disorder (e.g. borderline, antisocial, schizoaffective personality disorders)
  • Self report of alcohol use of 4 drinks or more on 6 or more nights per week.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01679236). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search