Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=70 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Comparison of Pantoprazole and Ranitidine in Dyspepsia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01737840 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
70
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2015
Primary outcomePrimary: Visual Analogue Scale Score — 39.6; 42.3; 27.6; 28.3 Visual Analogue Scale

Summary

The H0 hypothesis of the study is there is no difference between pantoprazole and ranitidine in treating patients presented with dyspepsia to the emergency department. The H1 hypothesis is there is difference between pantoprazole and ranitidine in treating patients presented with dyspepsia to the emergency department.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Visual Analogue Scale Score
39.6; 42.3; 27.6; 28.3
SECONDARY
Need for Additional Drug
13; 8

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Epigastric pain
  • Older than 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed as cholecystitis, pancreatitis, myocardial infarction, etc.. at the end of the emergency deparment evaluation period.
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with unstable vital signs
  • Patients used anti-acid, H2 receptor blockers and proton pomp inhibitors in the last one hour.
  • Allergy to H2 receptor blockers and proton pomp inhibitors.
  • Patients denied to give inform consent and who are illiterate
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01737840). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search