Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=200 Prevention

An Open Label Demonstration Project and Phase II Safety Study of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis

HIV Infection

Enrolled (actual)
200
Serious AEs
4.0%
Results posted
Dec 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Event of Grade 1 or Higher — 1 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
3MV (Behavioral); PCC (Behavioral); Emtricitabine/tenofovir (FTC/TDF (Truvada®)) (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Male
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Primary completion
Nov 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Serum Creatinine Event of Grade 1 or Higher
1
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Decrease in Absolute Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 48
97; 16; 1
PRIMARY
Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density at Baseline and at Week 48
1.09; 1.08
PRIMARY
Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density at Baseline and at Week 48
1.04; 1.03
PRIMARY
Total Body Bone Mineral Density at Baseline and at Week 48
1.20; 1.18
PRIMARY
Total Hip Bone Mineral Density at Baseline and at Week 48
1.10; 1.08
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Unprotected Sex Acts
143; 103
PRIMARY
Number of Sex Partners
5.41; 2.46; 1.65; 0.15
PRIMARY
Acceptability of PrEP: Distribution of Participant Feelings About Size of the Pill
13; 5; 26; 18; 60; 36 0.7513
PRIMARY
Acceptability of PrEP: Distribution of Participant Feelings About Taste of the Pill
11; 8; 33; 23; 53; 29 0.8281
PRIMARY
Acceptability of PrEP: Distribution of Participant Feelings About Color of the Pill
3; 2; 7; 6; 73; 48 0.3761
PRIMARY
Acceptability of PrEP: Distribution of Participant Feelings About Taking the Pill Every Day
6; 4; 24; 17; 63; 31 0.4359
PRIMARY
Acceptability of PrEP: Distribution of Participant Feelings About Taking Part in the Study
1; 1; 2; 1; 35; 29 0.3801
PRIMARY
Acceptability of PrEP: Distribution of Participant Feelings About HIV Test at Every Visit
1; 0; 1; 4; 29; 15 0.1968
PRIMARY
Acceptability of PrEP: Distribution of Participant Feelings About Risk Reduction Counseling at Every Visit
2; 1; 1; 5; 38; 23 0.1226
PRIMARY
Acceptability of PrEP: Distribution of Participant Feelings About Questions About Sexual Behavior
1; 1; 8; 13; 61; 31 0.0994
PRIMARY
Acceptability of PrEP: Distribution of Participant Feelings About Physician Exam
1; 1; 13; 4; 54; 38 0.5285
PRIMARY
Patterns of Use, Rates of Adherence and Measured Levels of Open Label FTC/TDF (Truvada®) Drug Exposure
13; 35; 58; 59; 8; 7
PRIMARY
Measured Levels of Drug Exposure (DBS RBC FTC-TP) When YMSM Are Provided Open Label FTC/TDF (Truvada®)
0.20; 0.19; 0.18; 0.16; 0.17; 0.15
PRIMARY
Measured Levels of Drug Exposure (DBS RBC TFV-DP) When YMSM Are Provided Open Label FTC/TDF (Truvada®)
584.56; 783.18; 793.37; 657.66; 671.72; 528.24
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 1 of 10: "I Learned a Lot From This Workshop/Session."
47; 32; 16; 47; 2; 4 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 2 of 10: "I Will be Able to Apply What I Learned From This Workshop/Session in my Life."
50; 48; 13; 34; 2; 1 0.0098 sig
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 3 of 10: "I Was Given an Opportunity to Participate and Discuss Information With Others."
55; 55; 10; 21; 0; 4 0.0766
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 4 of 10: "The Workshop/Session Was Well Organized."
49; 66; 13; 15; 4; 1 0.1581
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 5 of 10: "The Topic of This Workshop/Session Was Interesting."
47; 56; 16; 23; 2; 3 0.4300
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 6 of 10: "The Presenter(s) Stimulated my Interest in the Material."
50; 54; 14; 26; 1; 2 0.1201
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 7 of 10: "The Topic of This Workshop/Session Was Relevant to my Life."
50; 65; 13; 17; 1; 1 0.1682
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 8 of 10: "The Workshop/Session Was Enjoyable."
47; 49; 14; 28; 5; 4 0.2747
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 9 of 10: "I Would Recommend This Workshop/Session to Others."
49; 47; 10; 31; 6; 4 0.0046 sig
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Two Types of Efficacious Sexual Risk Reduction Interventions as Measured by Session Evaluation. Item 10 of 10: "I Felt Comfortable Participating in This Workshop/Session."
54; 55; 9; 23; 2; 5 0.0290 sig
SECONDARY
Demographic and/or Behavioral Difference Between Study Groups. Behavioral Disinhibition/Risk Compensation Endpoints Will be Compared. (Age)
20.28; 19.93 0.1070
SECONDARY
Explore Potential Demographic and/or Behavioral Differences Between Youth Who Are Interested in Participating in a PrEP Study Versus Those Who Are Not. Behavioral Disinhibition/Risk Compensation Endpoints Will be Compared.
SECONDARY
Demographic and/or Behavioral Difference Between Study Groups. Behavioral Disinhibition/Risk Compensation Endpoints Will be Compared. (Race, 5 Categories)
2; 0; 71; 22; 25; 17 0.2991
SECONDARY
Demographic and/or Behavioral Difference Between Study Groups. Behavioral Disinhibition/Risk Compensation Endpoints Will be Compared. (Race, 2 Categories)
84; 25; 57; 34 0.0298 sig
SECONDARY
Demographic and/or Behavioral Difference Between Study Groups. Behavioral Disinhibition/Risk Compensation Endpoints Will be Compared. (Ethnicity, Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic or Latino)
36; 17; 103; 42; 2; 0 0.8643
SECONDARY
Demographic and/or Behavioral Difference Between Study Groups. Behavioral Disinhibition/Risk Compensation Endpoints Will be Compared. (BMI, Categorical)
6; 3; 78; 31; 31; 12 0.9037
SECONDARY
Demographic and/or Behavioral Difference Between Study Groups. Behavioral Disinhibition/Risk Compensation Endpoints Will be Compared. (Log 10 Viral Load)
1.22; 1.14 0.5279
SECONDARY
Demographic and/or Behavioral Difference Between Study Groups. Behavioral Disinhibition/Risk Compensation Endpoints Will be Compared. (High Risk Sex Acts)
101; 42; 22; 12 0.5369
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders: Number Using Text Messaging Reminders
76
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders: Number Discontinuing Text Messaging Reminders
3
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 1: Away From Home)
31; 22; 17; 11; 19; 10 0.2193
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 2: Busy With Other Things)
33; 24; 17; 10; 14; 11 0.1255
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 3: Simply Forgot)
28; 21; 18; 14; 18; 9 0.0706
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 4: Too Many Pills)
62; 46; 7; 1; 2; 1 0.0088 sig
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 5: Side Effects)
64; 42; 7; 4; 2; 1 0.2482
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 6: Others Notice)
65; 43; 7; 3; 1; 1 0.1647
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 7: Routine Change)
51; 31; 9; 5; 10; 7 0.6880
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 8: Study Pill Harmful)
71; 45; 3; 1; 0; 1 0.2881
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 9: Fell Asleep)
52; 35; 13; 6; 5; 7 0.2223
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 10: Felt Ill)
61; 43; 9; 1; 3; 4 0.0617
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 11: Felt Depressed)
62; 43; 10; 1; 1; 4 0.0868
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 12: Ran Out of Pills)
67; 44; 7; 1; 0; 1 0.1847
SECONDARY
Acceptability and Feasibility of Text Message Reminders as Measured by Subject Rating of the Reasons for Missing Medications on a 4-point Likert Scale. (Question 13: No Risky Sex)
58; 43; 12; 4; 1; 1 0.0226 sig

Summary

Approximately 200 HIV-uninfected young men who have sex with men (YMSM) at high risk of acquiring HIV infection, ages 18-22 years, inclusive, will be recruited across all participating Adolescent Medicine Trials Units (AMTU). The behavioral intervention will be assigned at the level of the site, which include Many Men, Many Voices (3MV) and Personalized Cognitive Counseling (PCC). Subjects will first complete the behavioral intervention offered at their respective site and then be provided with open label emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir (TDF) (Truvada®) as PrEP. Behavioral and biomedical data will be collected at baseline and 0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks. Any subjects who become HIV infected during the course of the study will be discontinued from the study agent and followed for an additional 24 weeks after the study visit at which HIV infection is confirmed. Those subjects who meet specific bone or renal criteria at the Week 48 visit or the 24-Week HIV Seropositive visit will be followed for an additional 48 weeks in the Extension Phase to monitor longer-term outcomes of potential concerns.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent;
  • Male gender at birth;
  • Age 18 years and 0 days through 22 years and 364 days, inclusive, at the time of signed informed consent;
  • Self reports evidence of high risk for acquiring HIV infection including at least one of the following:
  • At least one episode of unprotected anal intercourse with an HIV-infected male partner or a male partner of unknown HIV status during the last 6 months;
  • Anal intercourse with 3 or more male sex partners during the last 6 months;
  • Exchange of money, gifts, shelter, or drugs for anal sex with a male partner during the last 6 months;
  • Sex with a male partner and has had a sexually transmitted infection (STI) during the last 6 months or at screening;
  • Sexual partner of an HIV-infected man with whom condoms were not consistently used in the last 6 months; or
  • At least one episode of anal intercourse where the condom broke or slipped off during the last 6 months;
  • Tests HIV antibody negative at time of screening;
  • Willing to provide locator information to study staff;
  • Willing to take pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP);
  • Willing to participate in behavioral intervention;
  • Reports intention not to relocate out of the Adolescent Medicine Trial Unit (AMTU) study area during the course of the study; and
  • Does not have a job or other obligations that would require long absences from the AMTU study area (greater than 4 weeks at a time).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Appears visibly distraught or presence of active serious psychiatric symptoms (e.g., active hallucinations, suicidal, homicidal, or exhibiting violent behavior) at the time of consent;
  • Intoxicated or under the influence of alcohol or other drugs at the time of consent;
  • Any significant uncontrolled, active or chronic disease process that, in the judgment of the site investigator, would make participation in the study inappropriate. (Appropriately managed conditions, like well-controlled diabetes, would not preclude enrollment; the site is encouraged to contact the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN) 110 Protocol Team if they are having difficulty making the judgment.);
  • History of bone fractures not explained by trauma;
  • Acute or chronic hepatitis B infection as indicated by positive hepatitis B surface antigen (sAg) test at time of screening;
  • Confirmed renal dysfunction (Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) 0.37 g/g at time of screening, regardless of urine dipstick protein result;
  • Confirmed normoglycemic glucosuria as indicated by urine dipstick result ≥ 1+ in the presence of normal serum glucose (<120 mg/dL) at time of screening;
  • A confirmed Grade ≥ 3 toxicity on any screening evaluations;
  • Known allergy/sensitivity to the study agent or its components;
  • Concurrent participation in an HIV vaccine study or other investigational drug study, including oral or topical PrEP (microbicide) studies;
  • Use of disallowed medications ; or
  • Inability to understand spoken English.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01772823). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search