N/A
Completed N=400
AVJ-301 Clinical Trial: A Clinical Evaluation of AVJ-301 (Absorb™ BVS) in Japanese Population
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01844284 ↗Enrolled (actual)
400
Serious AEs
47.0%
Results posted
Feb 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) — 11; 5 Participants
Summary
Prospective, Randomized (2:1), active control, single-blind, non-inferiority, multicenter, Japanese Clinical Trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Absorb™ BVS (AVJ-301) in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions in Japanese population by comparing to approved metallic drug eluting stent.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) |
28; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Any Death/Any MI/Revascularization (DMR) |
74; 34 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Any Death/Any MI/Revascularization (DMR) |
74; 34 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Any Death/Any MI/Revascularization (DMR) |
74; 34 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Any Death/Any MI/Revascularization (DMR) |
74; 34 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Any Death/Any MI/Revascularization (DMR) |
74; 34 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Any Death/Any MI/Revascularization (DMR) |
74; 34 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Any Death/Any MI/Revascularization (DMR) |
74; 34 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Any Death/Any MI/Revascularization (DMR) |
74; 34 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) |
41; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) |
41; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) |
41; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) |
41; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) |
41; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) |
41; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) |
41; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF) |
41; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) |
28; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) |
28; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) |
28; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) |
28; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) |
28; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) |
28; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Lesion Failure (TLF) |
28; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Cardiac Death/All MI |
20; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Cardiac Death/All MI |
20; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Cardiac Death/All MI |
20; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Cardiac Death/All MI |
20; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Cardiac Death/All MI |
20; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Cardiac Death/All MI |
20; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Cardiac Death/All MI |
20; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Cardiac Death/All MI |
20; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) |
38; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) |
38; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) |
38; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) |
38; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) |
38; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) |
38; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) |
38; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) |
38; 17 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven TVR (ID-TVR) |
34; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven TVR (ID-TVR) |
34; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven TVR (ID-TVR) |
34; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven TVR (ID-TVR) |
34; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven TVR (ID-TVR) |
34; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven TVR (ID-TVR) |
34; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven TVR (ID-TVR) |
34; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven TVR (ID-TVR) |
34; 13 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) |
26; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) |
26; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) |
26; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) |
26; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) |
26; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) |
26; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) |
26; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) |
26; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven Revascularization (ID-TLR) |
21; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven Revascularization (ID-TLR) |
21; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven Revascularization (ID-TLR) |
21; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven Revascularization (ID-TLR) |
21; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven Revascularization (ID-TLR) |
21; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven Revascularization (ID-TLR) |
21; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven Revascularization (ID-TLR) |
21; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Ischemia-driven Revascularization (ID-TLR) |
21; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Experiencing All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-Cardiovascular) |
15; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Experiencing All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-Cardiovascular) |
15; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Experiencing All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-Cardiovascular) |
15; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Experiencing All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-Cardiovascular) |
15; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Experiencing All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-Cardiovascular) |
15; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Experiencing All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-Cardiovascular) |
15; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Experiencing All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-Cardiovascular) |
15; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Experiencing All Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-Cardiovascular) |
15; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction ((MI: Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (Q-MI) or Non- Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (NQ-MI)) |
19; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction ((MI: Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (Q-MI) or Non- Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (NQ-MI)) |
19; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction ((MI: Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (Q-MI) or Non- Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (NQ-MI)) |
19; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction ((MI: Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (Q-MI) or Non- Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (NQ-MI)) |
19; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction ((MI: Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (Q-MI) or Non- Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (NQ-MI)) |
19; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction ((MI: Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (Q-MI) or Non- Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (NQ-MI)) |
19; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction ((MI: Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (Q-MI) or Non- Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (NQ-MI)) |
19; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction ((MI: Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (Q-MI) or Non- Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (NQ-MI)) |
19; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel MI (TV-MI) |
17; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel MI (TV-MI) |
17; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel MI (TV-MI) |
17; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel MI (TV-MI) |
17; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel MI (TV-MI) |
17; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel MI (TV-MI) |
17; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel MI (TV-MI) |
17; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Target Vessel MI (TV-MI) |
17; 6 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis |
0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis |
0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis |
0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis |
0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis |
0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis |
0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis |
0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY In-segment Late Loss (Non-inferiority) |
5; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Nitrate Vaso-reactivity Analysis / In-device Mean Lumen Diameter : Pre-Nitroglycerin (NTG) |
2.43; 2.76 | — |
| SECONDARY Nitrate Vaso-reactivity Analysis/ In-device Mean Lumen Diameter: Absolute Vaso Dilatation |
0.06; 0.07 | — |
| SECONDARY Nitrate Vaso-reactivity Analysis / In-device Mean Lumen Diameter : Post-Nitroglycerin (NTG) |
2.49; 2.82 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Cardiac Death, All MI, ID-TLR (MACE) |
30; 11 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Not Ischemia-driven TLR (NID-TLR) |
6; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Non-Target Vessel MI (NTV-MI) |
3; 2 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Subject must be at least 20 years of age.
- Subject or a legally authorized representative must provide written Informed Consent prior to any study related procedure, per site requirements.
- Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable or unstable angina, silent ischemia) suitable for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Subject must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
- Subject must be able to take dual antiplatelet therapy for up to 1 year following the index procedure and anticoagulants prior/during the index procedure. Therefore the subject has no known allergic reaction, hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine or heparin.
- Female subject of childbearing potential must not be pregnant* at the index procedure and does not plan pregnancy for up to 1 year following the index procedure.
- Except for non-pregnancy is apparent, negative pregnancy result within 7 days prior to the index procedure is required.
- Female subject is not breast-feeding at the time of the screening visit and will not be breast-feeding for up to 1 year following the index procedure.
- Subject agrees to not participate in any other investigational or invasive clinical study for a period of 13 months following the index procedure
Exclusion Criteria
- Elective surgery is planned within 1 year after the procedure that will require general anesthesia or discontinuing either aspirin or Thienopyridine.
- Subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to device material and its degredants (everolimus, poly (L-lactide), poly (DL-lactide), lactide, lactic acid) and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- Subject has a known contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- Subject had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) within 72 hours of the index procedure
- The subject is currently experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with new onset AMI, such as nitrate-unresponsive prolonged chest pain with ischemic ECG changes
- Creatine Kinase (CK) and Creatine Kinase - Muscle and Brain (CK-MB) have not returned to within normal limits at the time of index procedure.
- Subject has an unstable cardiac arrhythmia which is likely to become hemodynamically unstable due to arrhythmia.
- Subject has a known left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 30 days before the index procedure or between 24 hours and 30 days before the index procedure if successful and uncomplicated.
- Subject requires future staged PCI either in target or non target vessels.
- Subject has a malignancy that is not in remission.
- Subject is receiving immunosuppressant therapy or has known immunosuppressive or autoimmune disease (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.,). Note: corticosteroids are not included as immunosuppressant therapy, diabetes mellitus is not regarded as autoimmune disease.
- Subject has received any solid organ transplants or is on a waiting list for any solid organ transplants.
- Subject has previously received or scheduled to receive radiotherapy to coronary artery (brachytherapy), or chest/mediastinum.
- Subject is receiving or will require chronic anticoagulation therapy (e.g., coumadin or any other agent for any reason).
- Subject has a platelet count 700, 000 cells/mm3.
- Subject has a documented or suspected cirrhosis of Child-Pugh ≥ Class B.
- Subject has known renal insufficiency;
- Dialysis at the time of screening.
- An estimated Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 5 mm, arteriovenous malformation)
- Subject will refuse blood transfusions
- Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) within the past six months,
- Subject has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion.
- Subject has lif
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844284). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.