Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=100 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen Compared to Intravenous Ketorolac for Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

Pain

Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity at Rest) — 30; 32 units on a scale (in mm)

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
IV ibuprofen (Drug); Ketorolac (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals
Primary completion
Aug 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity at Rest)
30; 32
PRIMARY
Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity With Movement)
32; 41
SECONDARY
Rescue Medication Use in Post-operative Period
13.7; 13.2; 188.5; 179.1
SECONDARY
Time to First Use of Rescue Med Will be Measured
1.2; 1.2
SECONDARY
Patient Satisfaction
0; 1; 4; 8; 20; 18
SECONDARY
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events
0; 0

Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen compared to ketorolac for the treatment of postoperative pain as measured by patient pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inadequate IV access.
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of ibuprofen, ketorolac, aspirin (or aspirin related products), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors.
  • Less than 18 years of age.
  • Use of analgesics less than 8 hours prior to surgery.
  • Patients with active, clinically significant anemia.
  • History or evidence of asthma or heart failure.
  • Pregnant.
  • Recent history of chronic opioid use.
  • Concomitant use of probenecid.
  • Inability to understand the requirements of the study, be willing to provide written informed consent (as evidenced by signature on an informed consent document approved by an Institutional Review Board [IRB]), and agree to abide by the study restrictions and to return for the required assessments.
  • Refusal to provide written authorization for use and disclosure of protected health information.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01901393). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search